Back to Post
| Username | Post: Seeding watch |
|---|---|
|
Streamers Professor Posts 8236 
|
03-12-17 02:00 PM - Post#226533
One downside to Ivymadness is that the bid is not locked in days in advance of selection Sunday. I used to enjoy the long threads around seeding watch, S-curves, etc. With PU in a safe lead, time to have that discussion. Lunardi has them as a 13, and he's usually right. I doubt anything that happens today will change that picture. I think they deserve a 12, but some of those early season OOC results while they adjusted to the injuries have hurt them. I do think the difference matters a the 5s look a lot weaker than the 4s at this stage. Thoughts? |
|
sparman PhD Student Posts 1346 
|
03-12-17 02:13 PM - Post#226539
I have no idea how accurate this source is, but they have PU at 12. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/sports/wp/2017... |
|
SRP Postdoc Posts 4911 |
03-12-17 02:14 PM - Post#226540
I feel kind of bad for a four seed that draws Princeton. Not much of a reward there over being a five seed. |
|
Tiger69 Postdoc Posts 2814 |
03-12-17 02:21 PM - Post#226542
If I ever had a kid who told me that he wanted to grow up to be a "bracketologist", I would tell him/her to pay its own education. Lunardi yammering in the inset box while the game was in progress was easily the most irritating moment of the tournament for me. More importantly, Congratulations, Mitch, coaches and Tigers, whatever happens from here.  Next season looks like lots of outstanding play throughout the IL |
|
|
 |
|
| Copyright © 2004-2012 Basketball U. Terms of Use for our Site and Privacy Policy are applicable to you. All rights reserved. Basketball U. and its subsidiaries are not affiliated in any way with any NCAA athletic conference or member institution. |
|