Username | Post: Early Season "Swing Games" |
---|---|
IvyBballFan Masters Student Posts 479 |
11-07-17 08:40 PM - Post#235636
If one combines amalgamated Pre-Season Rankings with game location, one can: a) get a sense of individual Ivy team records at the start of league play; and b) come up with a series of Ivy/non-con “swing†games to watch over the next three weeks. The way that pre-season is scheduled, it looks as if Brown, Columbia, Cornell, and Dartmouth will be hard put to come out of the pre-season with more than four W’s each. The start for the Lions looks particularly brutal. The other four schools have a much better chance of heading into league play with winning records. However, it will be tough for any of them to get double digit wins. Without knowing four or five non-predictable matchups that will occur in pre-season tournaments, the Ivies will do well to enter league play with a combined .500 record. The early-season games below should be tightly contested. The overall trend in these 12 games may give early hints as to how the individual teams, and the league as a whole will fare this year: Penn@Fairfield (Sa 11-Nov) Brown@Quinnipiac (M 13-Nov) LaSalle@Penn (M 13-Nov) BYU@Prin (W 15-Nov) Yale@Albany (F 17-Nov) Brown@St. Francis (NY) (Su 19-Nov) Cornell@UMass Lowell (Su 19-Nov) LIU@Brown (Sa 25-Nov) Yale@Vermont (Sa 25-Nov) Brown@Bryant (Su 26-Nov) Loyola (MD)@Dartmouth (Tu 28-Nov) Dartmouth@Sacred Heart (Tu 5-Dec) |
HARVARDDADGRAD Postdoc Posts 2685 |
11-15-17 03:13 PM - Post#236404
College Basketball Insider has a Mid Major Top 25 that is updated on Mondays. Currently, Harvard is #6, Princeton is #22, and Yale is #30 (in votes - it's a top 25 listing). Big games in the next 10 days: Tonight: BYU (#8) at Princeton Thanksgiving: Harvard vs St. Marys (#2) Vermont (#3) visits Yale on Nov. 25th and Harvard on Jan. 2nd. The entire Ivy League avoids Bucknell (#7) this season. Not sure if this suggests that the Mid Majors are tough this year, but Indiana St. (#25) already beat Indiana by 21. |
TigerFan PhD Student Posts 1871 |
11-18-17 10:11 PM - Post#236883
Not the season some folks expected as presumed top 4 look pretty wobbly (but congratulations to the Quakers for today's big win over Penn State Brandywine--you should be very proud). |
palestra38 Professor Posts 32685 |
11-18-17 10:41 PM - Post#236892
Mandatory game for those in Gulf Coast Classic (all the competitors in Estero had to play a Div 3 game at home for 1st round--don't know why but they did). But thanks anyway. And congrats on a hard fought 13 point loss to Joe's. |
Silver Maple Postdoc Posts 3765 |
11-18-17 11:52 PM - Post#236903
Turnabout is fair play. We've certainly heaped abuse and derision on Princeton fans every year for their pathetic annual post-exams DIII tumble. They're allowed to repay us in kind. |
palestra38 Professor Posts 32685 |
11-19-17 12:23 AM - Post#236906
They schedule one...and lost to Carnegie Mellon. We accepted the requirement that we play these guys to play the prestigious Gulf Coast "Classic" |
Silver Maple Postdoc Posts 3765 |
11-19-17 10:15 AM - Post#236917
True, but show some compassion. They're Princeton fans. No Penn fan can possibly understand the constant shame and humiliation that goes with that. |
Tiger69 Postdoc Posts 2801 |
11-19-17 01:45 PM - Post#236944
Still have that chip on your shoulder! Do tell us how t got there. |
Silver Maple Postdoc Posts 3765 |
11-19-17 11:28 PM - Post#236969
Pete Carril once bit my dog. It was horrible. |
palestra38 Professor Posts 32685 |
11-20-17 12:58 PM - Post#237004
What a terrible weekend for Ivy teams. Columbia and Yale lose to Penn State and Albany Friday, Harvard and Princeton lose to Manhattan and St Joe's Saturday, and Brown and Cornell lose to St Francis Bklyn and UMass-Lowell on Sunday. Thankfully, Penn and Yale beat up on non-Division 1 teams as well. |
Silver Maple Postdoc Posts 3765 |
11-20-17 02:12 PM - Post#237023
If all we can point to for accomplishments is hammering a couple of D3 opponents, that's nothing to brag about. But no snarky comments about Princeton and St. Joes, or there might be some retorts involving chips and shoulders. |
Tiger69 Postdoc Posts 2801 |
11-21-17 01:42 PM - Post#237211
Pete must have bit him really hard! Get a cat. |
yoyo Senior Posts 354 |
11-21-17 03:52 PM - Post#237228
you talking to yourself again? |
Tiger69 Postdoc Posts 2801 |
11-21-17 04:11 PM - Post#237229
Just some good-natured exchanges with my Pennfriend and fellow Jerseyite SM. You can ignore us |
HARVARDDADGRAD Postdoc Posts 2685 |
11-25-17 07:08 PM - Post#237589
As an opponent of the Tournament, things looking pretty weak for right now. 1. Big gap between #4 Penn (KP#149) and #5 Columbia (KP#195); 2. Second bid already an impossibility; 3. Four teams ranked KP#114 to KP#149 will struggle through the season, hoping not to lose a spot in the tournament; 4. Projected #4 seed gets home court advantage; 5. Possible multi team title chase over the last two weekends is largely irrelevant; and 6. Actually, next 100 days largely irrelevant. Good luck to the healthiest/luckiest team March 10-11. |
SomeGuy Professor Posts 6391 |
11-26-17 09:02 AM - Post#237909
On the kenpom gap from 4 to 5, we had the same thing last year, and we still got a great race for the last spot. Presuming for a moment that HYP are really as close as they appear in kenpom, to me the added games to determine who goes to the NCAAs seems like a good thing, or at least not a a bad thing. Why not determine the winner over 16 instead of 14? I do agree that there is some unfairness in the venue, particularly if Penn is 4th but close. That said, while I am obviously biased, I thought it was a very fun event last year, and a good showcase for the league (and its best venue). |
westphillywarrior Sophomore Posts 196 |
11-26-17 01:25 PM - Post#237945
As an opponent of the Tournament, things looking pretty weak for right now. 1. Big gap between #4 Penn (KP#149) and #5 Columbia (KP#195); 2. Second bid already an impossibility; 3. Four teams ranked KP#114 to KP#149 will struggle through the season, hoping not to lose a spot in the tournament; 4. Projected #4 seed gets home court advantage; 5. Possible multi team title chase over the last two weekends is largely irrelevant; and 6. Actually, next 100 days largely irrelevant. Good luck to the healthiest/luckiest team March 10-11. That about says it all. Very sad. We'll see you at the Palestra March 10-11. |
westphillywarrior Sophomore Posts 196 |
11-26-17 01:28 PM - Post#237947
"Why not determine the winner over 16 instead of 14?" That's a pretty funny line. Don't you mean "Why not determine the winner over 2 instead of 14?" |
Tiger69 Postdoc Posts 2801 |
11-26-17 02:04 PM - Post#237949
I reacted the same way. Then, it occurred to me that, if the race were close, then perhaps a tournament could be tacked on for any teams finishing within, say, a couple of games of first place, truly extending the season 2-4 games, and giving the close also-rans a chance to overtake the regular season champ. Of course, regular season record would have to be given equal weight for this to be justified IMHO. Just hypothetical. I'm afraid that nothing will change the current, stupid circus. All college sports, like politics, seem to be drifting toward hype and money. |
HARVARDDADGRAD Postdoc Posts 2685 |
11-26-17 04:49 PM - Post#237958
Why extend anything? A 14 game round robin tournament worked very well for decades. If you can't beat your brethren over 100 days, why should you get another try? Sure, the recent regular season ties resulted in exciting tie breakers. But does that mean we should create a faux tie situation by ignoring the regular season? In a multi-bid league, a tournament can work to your advantage. In a single bid league, it highlights and exposes our mediocrity. If you think the Ivy League is not mediocre, then why are we without a top 100 team? |
Tiger69 Postdoc Posts 2801 |
11-26-17 09:03 PM - Post#237988
No argument. You're preachin' to the Choir. I was merely giving a charitable interpretation to Some Guy's post about determining a champ over 16 games. |
bradley PhD Student Posts 1842 |
11-26-17 10:33 PM - Post#237997
Fortunately, it is very early in the season and perhaps, several of the IL teams will perform better as the non-conference season continues on. Brown, Cornell and possibly Penn will get better over time which will be a plus for the league. Harvard may also go off on a good winning streak and try to get a bid irregardless of the IL Tournament, unlikely but you never know. At the end of the day, the major excitement for the IL regular season will probably be which team finishes fourth like last year. It makes sense for a good to very good IL team to play a very competitive non-conference schedule in order to secure an invitation without winning the IL Tournament and hope that the other IL teams play competitively in non-conference action. The other play by a coach might be to simply develop your team during non-conference play in order to peak for the March weekend and be less concerned about non-conference wins/losses. Legitimate questions regarding the IL Tournament would become somewhat muted if the league improves enough to truly have two representatives. |
SomeGuy Professor Posts 6391 |
11-26-17 11:11 PM - Post#238000
To me, it is over 16. if you are within a game or two, it very well could be that a 2nd place regular season team that wins the tourney will end up with the best conference record after 16. |
SomeGuy Professor Posts 6391 |
11-26-17 11:14 PM - Post#238001
Is it really a fair advantage when we were literally the only league in the country choosing our representative without a tournament? |
HARVARDDADGRAD Postdoc Posts 2685 |
12-03-17 12:13 PM - Post#238886
I don't know if it's been discussed much, but school academic calendars were reputedly a major influence on last year's tournament. For example, I know that Harvard players apparently pulled all nighters for midterms and papers before boarding the bus from Boston to Philly. Penn had the week off to practice on the home court. I knew more about Princeton and Yale then. Looking to this year: Harvard, Yale, Columbia: midterms likely (Harvard definitely) right up to the tournament weekend, which is at the start of spring break Penn: week off (spring break) heading into the tournament; midterms completed over a week prior to tip off. Dartmouth: Final exams (not midterms) start Friday and end Monday, tournament most inconvenient - right in the middle. Princeton: midterm week follows the tournament Brown, Cornell: uncertain, appears midterms are likely two weeks after tournament (could start week following) Please feel free to update with info. Thus: Advantage: 1) Penn 2) Brown, Cornell Disadvantage: 1) Dartmouth 2) Harvard, Yale, Columbia 3) Princeton Bias acknowledged, but the Ivy League couldn't have tipped the scales more if it tried. Schools with exams have to travel the furthest (Dartmouth, Harvard), while the only school with a week off plays at home. Good Job. |
Silver Maple Postdoc Posts 3765 |
12-03-17 01:36 PM - Post#238895
Just keep reminding yourself of what the Ivy Tournament is, and what it is not. - The Ivy tournament is an entertainment product. It appears to have been created to increase visibility for the conference, give the players and fans a few more games to enjoy, and maybe make a bit of money (although that's probably a fantasy). - The Ivy tournament has nothing to do with "fairness" (whatever that even is) or with identifying the best team(s) to represent the league in post season play. If you keep those two points in mind, all of this makes sense. |
SRP Postdoc Posts 4894 |
12-03-17 01:58 PM - Post#238897
Fairness is central to the entertainment value. |
HARVARDDADGRAD Postdoc Posts 2685 |
12-03-17 02:01 PM - Post#238898
Fair enough - or not |
Silver Maple Postdoc Posts 3765 |
12-03-17 02:13 PM - Post#238899
Fairness is central to the entertainment value. You could actually make a pretty convincing argument for the contrary. The lack of fairness (or, if you prefer, arbitrariness) gives fans a lot to argue and gripe about. And we all know how much sports fans enjoy bickering and kvetching. |
|
Copyright © 2004-2012 Basketball U. Terms of Use for our Site and Privacy Policy are applicable to you. All rights reserved. Basketball U. and its subsidiaries are not affiliated in any way with any NCAA athletic conference or member institution. |