Back to Post
| Username | Post: @Yale | |
|---|---|---|
|
PennFan10 Postdoc Posts 3587 |
02-09-19 11:19 AM - Post#275643
Line opens Yale -6 |
|
|
SomeGuy Professor Posts 6413 |
02-09-19 02:22 PM - Post#275672
Should be interesting to see how the matchups play here. Yale will play a lot bigger than Brown. Hopefully Max is ok and has another 20 minute night in him. Our defensive depth on the perimeter will help (last year I thought we had a little bit of a problem guarding all 3 of their guards — we could take 2 away, but not all 3). As with Brown, I like how we match up with Yale, and I think we have more than a puncher’s chance tonight. |
|
|
Quakers03 Professor Posts 12533 |
02-09-19 08:26 PM - Post#275702
I don’t know what to say about the lack of interest in this. Weird. Down 4 under 8. We can’t buy a foul call down low while Yale is parading to the line. 3s not failing either. Yale turns have helped keep it close. |
|
|
weinhauers_ghost Postdoc Posts 2140 |
02-09-19 08:31 PM - Post#275704
Two point game. It's been very sloppy on both sides. Neither team is shooting well. |
|
|
Quakers03 Professor Posts 12533 |
02-09-19 08:35 PM - Post#275705
4-16 from 3. Wang is way off and Bryce isn’t himself. Offensive rebounds have actually been on our side but we haven’t converted on them much. Oni getting his but making him work a bit. They need the 3s to drop. It’s that simple. |
|
|
penn nation Professor Posts 21212 |
02-09-19 08:38 PM - Post#275706
When's the last time Eddie Scott got into a meaningful game situation? |
|
|
Quakers03 Professor Posts 12533 |
02-09-19 08:43 PM - Post#275707
They try to go two for one and Woods bricks one horribly. Leads to a transition for Oni and a second foul on Woods. Bad exchange. |
|
|
Quakers03 Professor Posts 12533 |
02-09-19 08:44 PM - Post#275708
Chance after chance and they just can’t score. Sigh. Down 5 at half. |
|
|
penn nation Professor Posts 21212 |
02-09-19 08:44 PM - Post#275709
Lucky to only be down 5. Shooting has to improve. |
|
|
weinhauers_ghost Postdoc Posts 2140 |
02-09-19 08:45 PM - Post#275710
Yeah, that was a pretty rough sequence. We had two pretty good looks to end the half, but our shots are way off. We need to start the second half much stronger. Goodman's about the only one who's shot well so far. |
|
|
Quakers03 Professor Posts 12533 |
02-09-19 09:05 PM - Post#275715
How bad must it be for the Yale announcers to be complaining about the lack of calls that AJ gets. |
|
|
Quakers03 Professor Posts 12533 |
02-09-19 09:09 PM - Post#275716
Refs letting them play is benefiting Yale right now. Danger zone. Seriously, where is everyone? Don’t tell me most of you old heads have a life. |
|
|
73Quaker Freshman Posts 61 |
02-09-19 09:10 PM - Post#275717
Brown 78 PRinceton 70 |
|
|
Quakers03 Professor Posts 12533 |
02-09-19 09:11 PM - Post#275719
The number of points they have given up off of bricks is approaching 10. 15-51. Wow. |
|
|
Quakers03 Professor Posts 12533 |
02-09-19 09:13 PM - Post#275720
Max keeping them alive with follow ups and on a big possession Copeland goes 1 on 3 and gets a late call. |
|
|
weinhauers_ghost Postdoc Posts 2140 |
02-09-19 09:13 PM - Post#275721
As usual, we're doing a good job running shooters off the three point line. The bad news is that Yale's offense is killing us everywhere else on the floor. |
|
|
Quakers03 Professor Posts 12533 |
02-09-19 09:17 PM - Post#275723
With a chance to cut it to 2 Dev turns it over. And now it’s 9. |
|
|
Quakers03 Professor Posts 12533 |
02-09-19 09:20 PM - Post#275724
Covering Bruner might be smart... |
|
|
weinhauers_ghost Postdoc Posts 2140 |
02-09-19 09:22 PM - Post#275725
Back down to 5. Brodeur has shown an effective left hand a couple of times so far tonight. Why doesn't he do that more often? |
|
|
Quakers03 Professor Posts 12533 |
02-09-19 09:26 PM - Post#275726
Fighting hard and a missed goaltend leads to a Yale and one. Brutal. Absolutely brutal. I’m having deja vu. |
|
|
Quakers03 Professor Posts 12533 |
02-09-19 09:27 PM - Post#275727
And that’s that. Thanks refs. Thanks a lot. Inexcusable to miss that. Changed the entire game. Eff this. |
|
|
weinhauers_ghost Postdoc Posts 2140 |
02-09-19 09:28 PM - Post#275728
This is looking grim. We get within one possession, but can't manage the score we need to keep the momentum going. And then they get a run going. What do we have left in this one? |
|
|
Streamers Professor Posts 8258 
|
02-09-19 09:29 PM - Post#275729
Is anyone surprised penn is not shooting well at PW? Offensive boards and 2nd chances are the surprise. Kept them in it for a while. Max really answered the bell tonight along with Woods. |
|
|
Quakers03 Professor Posts 12533 |
02-09-19 09:31 PM - Post#275730
I’m glad these Yale players are enjoying this. It will be remembered. That I promise. |
|
|
weinhauers_ghost Postdoc Posts 2140 |
02-09-19 09:34 PM - Post#275732
I’m glad these Yale players are enjoying this. It will be remembered. That I promise. Long memories on both sides. Kind of feels like payback for our win in the tournament semifinal last year. |
|
|
Quakers03 Professor Posts 12533 |
02-09-19 09:37 PM - Post#275734
Cornell has the Harvard lead to one. Great. |
|
|
Quakers03 Professor Posts 12533 |
02-09-19 09:57 PM - Post#275738
It’s really fun watching Harvard have awful possession after awful possession while Amaker sits with his hands in his pockets. This one could really hurt. |
|
|
Quakers03 Professor Posts 12533 |
02-09-19 10:01 PM - Post#275739
Amaker is a horrible game coach and no one can tell me otherwise. He has NOTHING at the end of games. He just tells the players to go. Works well. Not a good night. |
|
|
Chip Bayers Professor Posts 7001 
|
02-09-19 10:11 PM - Post#275742
This old head wasn’t posting because I was there for this disaster. Wang and Woods missed consecutive open 3 looks that could have tied it at 62 and we then made one bad decision after another to give up a 9-0 run. Ballgame. Just don’t have enough guys capable of scoring other ways when the threes aren’t falling, especially in the backcourt. Last year Foreman turned himself into one of those guys in Ivy play. We haven’t had the equivalent from the guards this year. |
|
|
Streamers Professor Posts 8258
|
02-09-19 10:21 PM - Post#275744
I know how this may sound but penn was playing with house money tonight. I really enjoyed watching PU go down with Cannady and what Cornell did to Harvard. That was special as Morgan was a non-event until late when he always has the ability to take over. Columbia predictably left their game in Cambridge last night. No shame there. |
|
|
Quakers03 Professor Posts 12533 |
02-09-19 10:29 PM - Post#275747
Good for you for going. And yes, those looks were wide open. Bryce having his worst game of the year didn’t help. |
|
|
Penndemonium PhD Student Posts 1900 |
02-09-19 10:52 PM - Post#275756
I only caught the last 8 minutes or so. The brought it close with plenty of time, but then it got away. Mike Wang took 2 quick release 3's. He has a good quick release, but his eyes and feet seemed less set than his good shots. Wood was trying to make things happen. He was defending players much larger (as usual) and certainly making them work. His three point shot is an enigma though. He sort of loses touch with the ball sometimes as he shoots and the shot isn't even close. Occasionally when he doesn't lose fingertip control, his shot looks pretty smooth and accurate. To me the key is that against Ivy competition they are just not moving the ball as briskly both in their passes and dribbling. Each player holds the ball just a bit longer to see their one-on-one possibilities, thinking that the Ivy competition is not as tough as their non-conference. The problem is that this Penn team is not more athletic than their competition. Their ball movement IS their advantage on offense. While they indeed may have more interesting one-on-one opportunities against Ivies, quick ball movement confuses the defense, makes them scramble, and opens up great shot opportunities. The great assisted baskets really dishearten their opponents. They are giving up the very thing that helped them to big games against good teams. |
|
|
Old Bear Postdoc Posts 3998 |
02-09-19 10:52 PM - Post#275757
Not sure why Steve played only 7 guys at Brown, I guess he was prepared to be happy with a split for the weekend. Brown was down 20 to 8 at the 10 minute mark in the first half and up 12 at half time against P'ton with DC scoring 0. The second half, Brown did to P'ton what Penn did to Brown on friday. That's the IL this year. |
|
|
PennFan10 Postdoc Posts 3587 |
02-10-19 12:14 AM - Post#275766
We gave up 44 points in the second half tonight. We can’t do that and shoot it poorly. When you have guys on the floor giving up more points than they are scoring, that’s bad combination. |
|
|
JadwinGeorge Senior Posts 357 |
02-10-19 01:20 AM - Post#275767
Damn Refs...cost the Quakers another game!!!! |
|
|
Quakers03 Professor Posts 12533 |
02-10-19 04:17 AM - Post#275768
Keep talking. It usually turns out well for you guys when you do. You’d think that after what happened only a few weeks ago, Princeton fans would find some humility and just stfu for once but nope, here we are. Karma will be a bitch. As for the ball movement issue, yes they did force it down the stretch but I think we see less assists because the teams know each other so well. Plus, they had their chances with some nice passing throughout the game and just couldn’t finish. It happens. The fact that it was as close as it was with them shooting as poorly as they did was a good sign. |
|
|
PennFan10 Postdoc Posts 3587 |
02-10-19 06:08 AM - Post#275769
The refs did not cost us the game. That’s a ridiculous statement. |
|
|
Charlie Fog Masters Student Posts 587 |
02-10-19 08:26 AM - Post#275771
he is a troll |
|
|
10Q Professor Posts 23405 |
02-10-19 08:40 AM - Post#275773
It's kind of depressing that a team that went 4-0 in the Big Five is struggling to make the Ivy Tournament. There is still plenty of hope, but the room for error is rather small. Let's get a home sweep next weekend. If we don't, that window will narrow a lot more. |
|
|
Quakers03 Professor Posts 12533 |
02-10-19 09:12 AM - Post#275776
Did people really expect us to win that game? I’d say the activity on the game thread was a good indicator of how others approached this game. If we had just split with Princeton would people still be in this mode? Yes it will be tough, but with 6 of 8 at home this is far from over. I also wonder how much the back to back comes into play when comparing performances from the early season. We’ve already determined that familiarity is probably the biggest reason for what we’re seeing. |
|
|
10Q Professor Posts 23405 |
02-10-19 09:14 AM - Post#275777
I expected a win. A team that can beat Villanova should beat Yale. But I get why we didn't. |
|
|
Quakers03 Professor Posts 12533 |
02-10-19 09:25 AM - Post#275779
After shooting 50% from 3 the night before? That is an excellent team we played in their gym and we were right in that thing. If Cornell hadn’t pulled the upset I imagine we would have been in the best spot or at least close. Now it gets harder. |
|
|
AntiUngvar Masters Student Posts 530 |
02-10-19 02:08 PM - Post#275802
Does it get harder? Six of Eight in Philadelphia; none of the remaining opponents are Monmouth. |
|
|
10Q Professor Posts 23405 |
02-10-19 02:09 PM - Post#275803
Let’s not make a Monmouth out of a mole hill. |
|
|
AntiUngvar Masters Student Posts 530 |
02-10-19 02:20 PM - Post#275805
All kidding aside, I'm envious of the fact that you guys are sure to have rooting interest in next month's Big Dance, one way or another (or both)! |
|
|
penn nation Professor Posts 21212 |
02-10-19 02:29 PM - Post#275806
Speaking of which--they won again last night, are now in sole possession of first place and have jumped from KP 350+ (12 games into the season) all the way to #289.
Does it get harder? Six of Eight in Philadelphia; none of the remaining opponents are Monmouth. |
|
|
AntiUngvar Masters Student Posts 530 |
02-10-19 02:35 PM - Post#275809
Right now, they're the best men's D-1 school team from the state of New Jersey. |
|
|
13otto Masters Student Posts 779 
|
02-15-19 10:07 AM - Post#276446
It's kind of depressing that a team that went 4-0 in the Big Five is struggling to make the Ivy Tournament. There is still plenty of hope, but the room for error is rather small. Let's get a home sweep next weekend. If we don't, that window will narrow a lot more. The first 2/3 of this season reminds me of the 2001-02 season. We opened that season with a win at Georgia Tech (as an 11-point underdog) en route to a 6-1 start, with the lone loss being to then #2 Illinois, by 7, in a game in which we were an 18 1/2 point underdog. We would finish the 2001-02 non-conference portion of our schedule with a 13-3 record, including an outright Big 5 championship with a perfect 4-0 city series record. But we started off the Ivy League season 2-3, with losses at Harvard (RPI #174), at home vs. lowly Columbia (RPI #214) and at Yale. We were 3 full games out of first place behind 5-0 Princeton & 6-1 Yale, no longer controlling our own destiny. Harvard was 5-2, in third place. With no Ivy League Tournament, we had to win out and hope that Yale and Princeton would split, just to gain a 3-way tie. We all know how that season played out. This season, we currently trail first-place Yale by 3 games, and second-place Cornell, Harvard & Princeton by two games each, but have to catch only one of those 4 teams. With 6 of our final 8 games at the Palestra, the odds of doing so should be more favorable than they were in 2002. It all starts this weekend at the Palestra. With a sweep, we're right where we need to be.
|
|
|
penn nation Professor Posts 21212 |
02-15-19 10:42 AM - Post#276454
We were neck and neck with the Illini in that pre-Thanksgiving tourney in Vegas for a good stretch of the game, too. In terms of this year, we have better odds due to a 4 team tourney although we've already lost the tiebreaker to Princeton and can only tie Cornell and Yale in head to head at best (we're not catching Yale, at any rate). The Cornell rematch is a must win for us, period. We must also beat Harvard at least once and if we lose to them this weekend we increase the degree of difficulty on making the IL tourney considerably.
It's kind of depressing that a team that went 4-0 in the Big Five is struggling to make the Ivy Tournament. There is still plenty of hope, but the room for error is rather small. Let's get a home sweep next weekend. If we don't, that window will narrow a lot more. The first 2/3 of this season reminds me of the 2001-02 season. We opened that season with a win at Georgia Tech (as an 11-point underdog) en route to a 6-1 start, with the lone loss being to then #2 Illinois, by 7, in a game in which we were an 18 1/2 point underdog. We would finish the 2001-02 non-conference portion of our schedule with a 13-3 record, including an outright Big 5 championship with a perfect 4-0 city series record. But we started off the Ivy League season 2-3, with losses at Harvard (RPI #174), at home vs. lowly Columbia (RPI #214) and at Yale. We were 3 full games out of first place behind 5-0 Princeton & 6-1 Yale, no longer controlling our own destiny. Harvard was 5-2, in third place. With no Ivy League Tournament, we had to win out and hope that Yale and Princeton would split, just to gain a 3-way tie. We all know how that season played out. This season, we currently trail first-place Yale by 3 games, and second-place Cornell, Harvard & Princeton by two games each, but have to catch only one of those 4 teams. With 6 of our final 8 games at the Palestra, the odds of doing so should be more favorable than they were in 2002. It all starts this weekend at the Palestra. With a sweep, we're right where we need to be. |
|
|
 |
|
| Copyright © 2004-2012 Basketball U. Terms of Use for our Site and Privacy Policy are applicable to you. All rights reserved. Basketball U. and its subsidiaries are not affiliated in any way with any NCAA athletic conference or member institution. |
|