Select "print" from your browser's "File" menu.

Back to Post
Username Post: Hofstra
Eric Von Zipper
Senior
Posts 343
11-09-23 05:58 PM - Post#358968    

Opens Hofstra -2 O/U 145 1/2
SRP
Postdoc
Posts 4919
11-09-23 07:40 PM - Post#358969    

Preview:
https://www.trentonian.com/2023/11/09/princeton- ba...
1LotteryPick1969
Postdoc
Posts 2280
1LotteryPick1969
11-10-23 08:22 PM - Post#358996    

What did Mitch see? What did he say??
SRP
Postdoc
Posts 4919
11-10-23 09:50 PM - Post#359003    

Just win, baby. Lots of clutch FTs down the stretch.
Albert08
Masters Student
Posts 574
11-10-23 09:57 PM - Post#359004    

Really good win on the road. Brett MacConnell with a well deserved smile on his face.
SRP
Postdoc
Posts 4919
11-10-23 10:01 PM - Post#359006    

Depth as well as the center position look like they will be continuing issues going forward. But a really good iron five that stays healthy and out of foul trouble can make life difficult on a lot of teams.
gokinsmen
Postdoc
Posts 3683
11-10-23 10:22 PM - Post#359007    

Another gritty, resilient win. I saw most of the first half but only a bit of the second.

Pierce had a monster game and the guys responded after Mitch got thrown out very early in the game. I assume he was arguing the questionable offensive calls that led to a lot of turnovers early.

That Iron Five is impressive but we really need at least one bench player to step up and contribute quality double-digit minutes. It's probably going to be Jack Scott, being a sophomore with good size.

TigerFan
PhD Student
Posts 1892
11-10-23 10:29 PM - Post#359009    

Really impressive road win over a very tough team. I missed the first 15 minutes so didn’t see Mitch’s ejection. Must have been wild. Caden is an absolute beast. Blake a driller. X has really shaken off the wildness from last year. Allocco is Allocco and Martini just tough as nails. This should be a really fun season!
whitakk
Masters Student
Posts 523
11-10-23 11:19 PM - Post#359017    

This team really reminds me of 2016-17 - five-out, sharing the ball, swarming defensively, little depth. I don't think they quite have the individual talent on either end to reach those heights but it's still successful and fun to watch.

Lee's block closing out from pretty far away on the corner three was something I don't remember seeing from a true guard at Princeton.

If my counting is right: 54-43 in about 23 minutes(!) with the five starters tonight, 20-24 in the other 17 minutes.
Tiger84
Senior
Posts 380
11-11-23 02:26 AM - Post#359026    

If I’ve got the chronology right, 16-17 had Amir Bell as a solid 6th man. Until and unless Davis develops, Scott becomes a reliable option or Austin returns from injury, this is an Iron 5 situation.
1LotteryPick1969
Postdoc
Posts 2280
1LotteryPick1969
11-11-23 05:36 AM - Post#359027    

I think Davis can step up as time goes by. He looks very comfortable, but his shots aren't dropping. Once he hits a few, I think he will emerge. And Huggins looks at least satisfactory on defense.
1LotteryPick1969
Postdoc
Posts 2280
1LotteryPick1969
11-11-23 06:10 AM - Post#359028    

  • Tiger84 Said:
If I’ve got the chronology right, 16-17 had Amir Bell as a solid 6th man. Until and unless Davis develops, Scott becomes a reliable option or Austin returns from injury, this is an Iron 5 situation.



Didn't start that thin; Brase and Caruso went out with injuries. So let's stay healthy this year. We have little margin. Although the Caruso injury allowed the emergence of Stephens.
Tiger81
Masters Student
Posts 412
Tiger81
11-11-23 10:21 AM - Post#359034    

Could not see the game and the only highlights I could find were all on Hofstra’s end. Looking at the box score, interesting that the few bench minutes came from a sophomore and two freshman. I loved the cohesion and intensity that we saw from the starters against Rutgers and that appears to have been the case as well last night.

But Coach Henderson will need to find other combinations that work when opponents get the Tigers in foul trouble.

A piece in PAW last week said that Deven Austin is likely to be out “for a sizable part of this season“ so it seems like the answers will need to come from Scott, Davis, Huggins and any other freshmen who emerge.
gokinsmen
Postdoc
Posts 3683
11-11-23 01:02 PM - Post#359037    

It's such a bummer not having Austin. He became a major role player on both ends and was due for a huge leap this season. Probably our best perimeter defender when healthy.

Just hope he makes it back for Ivy play. During non-conf, we can get away with an Iron Five, but Ivy play has 4 back-to-backs (not including the ILT) that will wear the guys down.
whitakk
Masters Student
Posts 523
11-13-23 11:19 AM - Post#359088    

  • gokinsmen Said:
During non-conf, we can get away with an Iron Five, but Ivy play has 4 back-to-backs (not including the ILT) that will wear the guys down.



Even in the all-back-to-back era this was never really true. Harvard won in 2013 with four guys playing nearly every minute at the 1-4, Yale won in 2016 with three guys left at 1-3 for the final month, Princeton went undefeated in 2017 with like a 5.5-man rotation (Miller started but never played in crunch time).
iogyhufi
Masters Student
Posts 681
11-13-23 11:47 AM - Post#359089    

Yeah, the real risk of having no depth is injuries. Which are much more likely to happen when you play your starters heavy minutes!
sparman
PhD Student
Posts 1349
sparman
11-13-23 11:59 AM - Post#359091    

A team may be able to get away with it in the ivies, especially now that the IL is getting away from all back-to-back weekends, but I believe that when depth issues existed in the past, they have been a clear problem playing in the national tournaments against physically imposing P5 teams. Perhaps a secondary concern right now.
whitakk
Masters Student
Posts 523
11-13-23 09:43 PM - Post#359100    

Two of those three teams pulled NCAAT upsets with multiple guys playing 39+ minutes! (And the third was one shot away with one playing 40.)

Injuries are definitely a concern - that's the best reason to have depth (as the 2017 team showed). But given what they lost from last year, I'll take a team that can truly challenge for the league title if five guys stay healthy.
Tiger84
Senior
Posts 380
11-13-23 10:06 PM - Post#359101    

And yes, the Tigers won an NIT game with 5 players going 40 minutes, but that was a different century.
SRP
Postdoc
Posts 4919
11-13-23 10:54 PM - Post#359123    

The upside of an iron five can be better chemistry and coordination on the court. Help is not on the way, so solutions have to be found within the group, plus more minutes of learning one another's moves are logged.

Still makes me pretty nervous, especially without an obvious answer to teams who can speed up the pace and have a lot of size.
gokinsmen
Postdoc
Posts 3683
11-13-23 11:28 PM - Post#359127    

Good points. I suppose Iron Fives can work just fine. I'd just prefer having at least 1 major bench contributor ready to go every night. Even something as simple as foul trouble could derail us in a tight game.
1LotteryPick1969
Postdoc
Posts 2280
1LotteryPick1969
11-14-23 07:40 AM - Post#359149    

  • SRP Said:
Still makes me pretty nervous, especially without an obvious answer to teams who can speed up the pace and have a lot of size.



Such as Yale, perhaps?




Copyright © 2004-2012 Basketball U. Terms of Use for our Site and Privacy Policy are applicable to you. All rights reserved.
Basketball U. and its subsidiaries are not affiliated in any way with any NCAA athletic conference or member institution.
FusionBB™ Version 2.1 | ©2003-2007 InteractivePHP, Inc.
Execution time: 0.254 seconds.   Total Queries: 15   Zlib Compression is on.
All times are (GMT -0500) Eastern. Current time is 12:42 PM
Top