SomeGuy
Professor
Posts: 6413
Reg: 11-22-04
|
04-20-16 07:51 PM - Post#206402
In response to TheLine
I may be missing something in terms of the chronology, but the quote by the President seems to say that Nevada didn't review this additional allegedly exculpatory information until after announcing the hire. That seems like an incredible lack of due diligence to me. To me, that says that Nevada wasn't interested in or concerned about the issue until faculty and students made it a big deal. Regardless of whether they think the information exonerates him, I think the fact they apparently didn't initially track this down and review it shows a larger systemic issue.
I'm not at all surprised that Hufnagel is getting a second chance. I am amazed at how quickly the second chance came, and how it seems to come with the message that there wasn't an issue in the first place. That seems like the wrong message to send regarding somebody whose job is to teach young men.
|
