mrjames
Professor
Posts: 6062
Loc: Montclair, NJ
Reg: 11-21-04
|
02-13-18 08:50 AM - Post#247645
In response to whitakk
I don't know if it's more predictive of the future - something to test, for sure - but it seems better descriptive of the past. What I mean by that is that the efficiency margins, as you know, are merely the final score divided by pace. But you can get to that final score in myriad different ways (some ways are good representations of teams playing hard and at their best and some, umm, not so much), and this does a better job describing how we got there in one number.
Here are the past Game Scripts by year back to 2015 (note that by 2015, there are games here and there that are missing, but nothing major):
2018
Harvard: 42
Penn: 24
Princeton: 20
Yale: 10
Columbia: -5
Brown: -21
Dartmouth: -32
Cornell: -38
2017
Princeton: 110
Harvard: 41
Penn: 14
Yale: 6
Columbia: -18
Cornell: -38
Brown: -48
Dartmouth: -67
2016
Yale: 114
Princeton: 105
Columbia: 29
Dartmouth: -16
Harvard: -17
Penn: -51
Brown: -79
Cornell: -85
2015
Harvard: 57
Yale: 49
Princeton: 36
Columbia: 15
Dartmouth: -25
Brown: -32
Cornell: -33
Penn: -67
|