Untitled Document
Brown Columbia Cornell Dartmouth Harvard Penn Princeton Yale



Username Post: Dartmouth NLRB Decision
james 
Masters Student
Posts: 801

Age: 49
Reg: 03-18-19
02-06-24 07:05 AM - Post#362833    
    In response to Bruno

this is so confusing to me.... in terms of implications
how are the benefits to the employees (players) higher than the costs in a program that doesnt make money? (assuming correct) where players arent on scholarships which is also tricky
i guess i understand point on "working" conditions but most obvious impact is that means you fly charter to lawrence kansas in a pay game but maybe at the expense of womens fencing being financed?

i guess i do get the implications at usc if cali rules this way though i am not sure how many basketball programs outside of a few conferences are wildly profitable

football in sec a different story obv but players are already getting paid a bundle and if anything this tax could offset benefits already obtained. so net net could hurt those players you'd think


NOTE: You are viewing an individual Post. View the Entire Topic




Copyright © 2004-2012 Basketball U. Terms of Use for our Site and Privacy Policy are applicable to you. All rights reserved.
Basketball U. and its subsidiaries are not affiliated in any way with any NCAA athletic conference or member institution.
FusionBB™ Version 2.1 | ©2003-2007 InteractivePHP, Inc.
Execution time: 0.145 seconds.   Total Queries: 13   Zlib Compression is on.
All times are (GMT -0500) Eastern. Current time is 09:43 PM
Top