umbrellaman
Masters Student
Posts: 475
Reg: 11-21-04
|
02-27-17 09:59 PM - Post#223951
In response to sparman
Maybe I'm missing it (and I'm not interested in devoting hours to figuring this out) but I don't understand how they avoid the circular problem of applying tiebreakers for, say, #4 that require looking at W-L record versus #7, when you have to apply tiebreakers to determine #7 that are partly based on W-L versus #4.
Let's say you need to break 4 and 5, and 6 and 7 are also tied. You compare the combined records of 4 vs 6 and 7 vs 5 vs 6 and 7.
|
