SomeGuy
Professor
Posts: 6413
Reg: 11-22-04
|
02-28-17 07:41 AM - Post#223979
In response to hoopla
To me, MVP actually goes the other way -- I would define that as having even more of a good team component. I always view MVP as most valuable to winning. A guy who scores 20 in a losing effort every night isn't ultimately helping his team win, and unless he is Andre Dawson, he shouldn't be MVP (for the record, I don't think Dawson should have won that year, either).
|