SRP
Postdoc
Posts: 4917
Reg: 02-04-06
|
12-02-17 11:05 PM - Post#238848
In response to TigerFan
That was a blowout expanded by unusually good three-point shooting by Miami and unusually bad three-point shooting by PU. Tons of wide-open, in rhythm treys didn't go down, many missing badly. Meanwhile, the Miami sharpshooter couldn't miss and a bunch of guys who usually don't shoot threes were also knocking them in. 8-32 vs. 14-25s accounts for 18 points by itself. At 33% for both teams you'd have that as plus-3 for PU (note they'd still lose by seven if happened).
Miami is really good and will challenge in the ACC and the NCAA tournament. A lot of the Princeton turnovers were unforced by caused by players hurrying or worrying because of Miami's swarming play. And in the second half, the Canes started to get second shots as the Tigers wore down.
|