Go Green
PhD Student
Posts: 1146
Age: 52
Reg: 04-22-10
|
03-11-18 02:43 PM - Post#251961
In response to dperry
. . .Except that part of the disagreement with the rationales for the tournament is precisely that many of us don't believe that there are benefits, or that they are worth the negatives. The fact that we disagree with you does not mean that we're not paying attention to your arguments; we just don't think that the arguments are correct.
Can you imagine an Ivy football coach against FCS playoff participation (none exist, but bear with me) asking on a conference call "what are the benefits of sending our champion to the playoffs?" He'd be laughed off the call.
That's the equivalent of what Banghart (apparently) did. If she simply stated that she didn't agree with the benefits of a conference tournament, then fine. But to ask what they are is entirely disingenuous.
Edited by Go Green on 03-11-18 02:46 PM. Reason for edit: No reason given.
|
