I'm sure you guys don't need/want more Penn guys piling on with comments, but . . .. What I don't understand about what seems to be going on with Scott and Princeton is that getting better in the long run doesn't necessarily need to preclude taking advantage of the team that is there and won last year. Penn fans harp on whether or not Dunphy adjusts to the strengths of his personnel. Here, Scott already had a pretty good blueprint from last year. Why does developing the kind of team you want preclude trying to win for a year in a less strict system? The comments holding Savage out as the one guy he knows won't quit do kind of give a sense of where Scott's focus seems to be. Is it that damaging to his control or ability to ultimately develop the team he wants to just go ahead and stick more closely to what JTIII did?