Mike Porter
Postdoc
Posts: 3619
Loc: Los Angeles, CA
Reg: 11-21-04
|
02-06-24 07:12 PM - Post#362848
In response to SomeGuy
I'm the one who called it recruiting malpractice. It was mostly hyperbole to drive home the point, but if all you have left is to dispute the terminology, I think you've already lost the "high ground" in my view.
That said, if we want to get literal here... I think I will stand by my hyperbolic point.
"The courts define malpractice as the failure of a professional person to act in accordance with the prevailing professional standards."
If your argument is that the coaching staff chose Larson, a known project with nearly no real offers except for Penn's, instead of Nana...
Who if you believe nychoops at his word (and I do), the coaching staff ignored/didn't pursue, despite his interest (we didn't offer him) and despite him having a much better selection of college offers (a number of mid majors from the northeast) than Larson. Surely sounds like malpractice as defined above to me.
|
