IvyBballFan
Senior
Posts: 305
Age: 66
Reg: 11-19-09
|
05-07-10 10:29 AM - Post#83047
This guy looks like a pretty good get for Coach Agel and the Bears.
Is there any word whether he might be eligible in January?
That could further tighten up what is shaping up to be an interesting race for the top spot that involves five or six teams.
|
SomeGuy
Postdoc
Posts: 2154
Reg: 11-22-04
|
Re: Transfer Stephen Albrecht
05-07-10 11:55 AM - Post#83053
In response to IvyBballFan
How does the 4 in 5 rule work in a situation like this where the player already sat out a year?
Does he have 3.5 seasons of elibility left or 2.5?
|
pennhoops
Postdoc
Posts: 2118
Reg: 11-21-04
|
05-07-10 12:37 PM - Post#83057
In response to SomeGuy
According to BRF he'll have to sit out the entire season - since Albrecht had previously committed to Cornell (per BRF) I'm inclined to think he knows the details here.
|
Mike Porter
PhD Student
Posts: 1577
Loc: Los Angeles, CA
Reg: 11-21-04
|
Transfer Stephen Albrecht
05-07-10 02:46 PM - Post#83063
In response to pennhoops
Yes the good news for Brown is that when he was committed to Cornell, BRF implied he would be the next coming of Lebron James so you should all be in for a treat!
|
SomeGuy
Postdoc
Posts: 2154
Reg: 11-22-04
|
05-07-10 03:10 PM - Post#83065
In response to pennhoops
Does that mean 2.0 years of eligibility or something else? I can't read BRFian, so I need someone else to interpret.
|
gokinsmen
Postdoc
Posts: 2260
Reg: 02-06-10
|
05-07-10 04:08 PM - Post#83069
In response to SomeGuy
So after all of BRF's bluster and hype, this transfer not only turned down Cornell...but chose Brown instead? Ouch. Congrats to Brown, though. In 2011-12, once this guy is eligible, the Bears may compete after all (combined with the development of their underclassmen). They're getting a combo guard who can come in and score 10-15ppg right away.
|
Dmon826
Masters Student
Posts: 636
Loc: Philadelphia, PA
Reg: 01-15-06
|
05-07-10 04:43 PM - Post#83075
In response to gokinsmen
I hear he's down to 5 feet, 8 inches already.
|
Mike Porter
PhD Student
Posts: 1577
Loc: Los Angeles, CA
Reg: 11-21-04
|
05-08-10 02:56 PM - Post#83092
In response to Dmon826
BRF is sticking to his original way overblown guns on this one!
"Brown got a very good player, Albrecht is far better than any of the Harvard, Penn or Princeton recruits---- but Cornell will be just fine without him. Cornell will probably have the league's best back court next year."
I look forward to seeing what this kid can do in a couple years. Should be interesting.
|
gokinsmen
Postdoc
Posts: 2260
Reg: 02-06-10
|
Transfer Stephen Albrecht
05-08-10 06:07 PM - Post#83095
In response to Mike Porter
Well, if he's better than any of Harvard, Penn or Princeton's recruits, I guess he must blow Cornell's recruits out of the water. Anyway, Albrecht looks very good, but saying stuff like that is so silly and baseless. And almost certainly incorrect, IMO. I mean, he only played half a season and shot just 36% overall (despite shooting 41% from 3).
As for Cornell "probably having the best back court"...um, no. Rosen and Bernardini must be placed far ahead of Wrobo and  [whoever ends up the starting SG, which probably would have been Albrecht...but hey Cornell doesn't need him at all!]. Webster and Curry (with McNally as a key reserve) have more upside than Cornell's potential backcourt. And since Princeton can go with a 3-guard lineup, Davis, Mavraides, and ???[Clement, Bray, et al.] could certainly be as good as (or even better) than Cornell's guards.
|
mrjames
Postdoc
Posts: 3005
Loc: New York, NY
Reg: 11-21-04
|
Re: Transfer Stephen Albrecht
05-09-10 11:45 AM - Post#83114
In response to gokinsmen
His Pomeroy stats don't necessarily scream future star. He could provide a good shooting touch at a decent percentage, but other than that it's hard to see any other aspects of his game which will "wow" you at this point. He will have a year off to work on defense and getting more involved on the glass and maybe develop an go-to two point shot.
|
Howard Gensler
Postdoc
Posts: 3978
Reg: 11-21-04
|
05-09-10 12:21 PM - Post#83116
In response to mrjames
Also that Toledo was a disaster last season, winning only three D1 games and that he didn't play after the 12th game. Did he quit the team? Was he hurt? Coach's decision?
Also interesting that Albrecht, with a 4.2 GPA in HS considered no Ivies during his recruitment.
Sure seems like a very good shooter, however.
|
gokinsmen
Postdoc
Posts: 2260
Reg: 02-06-10
|
Transfer Stephen Albrecht
05-09-10 09:02 PM - Post#83127
In response to Howard Gensler
Supposedly, he had problems with the head coach and his "playing style." Who knows what that actually entails (maybe just a euphemism for "My coach and I hate each other."). He was recruited by Cornell in high school according to BRF's records.
Anyway, Brown is probably the right choice for Albrecht -- he'd get starter's minutes on either team, but there's a better chance to stand out at Brown given Cornell's recent success and the Bears' lack thereof. Albrecht seems to have "All-Ivy" potential...but not necessarily first-team or even second team (not at first anyway). The majority of elite Ivy players are guards after all.
|
Dmon826
Masters Student
Posts: 636
Loc: Philadelphia, PA
Reg: 01-15-06
|
05-09-10 09:10 PM - Post#83128
In response to gokinsmen
Why is he more likely to get minutes for Brown than Cornell again? The way I see it, the kid has a very similar skillset to three players already on Brown's roster (the Sullivan boys + Leffelman) and would also have to compete for minutes with their top recruit, that Harris kid, who's also a 2-guard I believe. At Cornell wouldn't he step in right away and be the second or third best guard on the roster? What am I missing?
|
Old Bear
Postdoc
Posts: 2138
Reg: 11-23-04
|
05-09-10 10:18 PM - Post#83133
In response to Dmon826
Brown had a very good point guard (McGonigall) and as well as highly regarded Hakeem Harris in the incoming class, and a 6'5", 2-3 from Ohio (Bieber?),as well as front court players, Tyler Ponticelli, who sat out last year, and 6'7" Dockery Walker in next year's freshman class, and another point guard committed for '11. With Albrecht, and last year's three frosh, Agel is stocking up with quality players. Stay tuned.
|
gokinsmen
Postdoc
Posts: 2260
Reg: 02-06-10
|
Transfer Stephen Albrecht
05-09-10 10:45 PM - Post#83135
In response to Dmon826
I didn't say he'd get more minutes at Brown. I said he'd get starter's-type minutes on either squad. Maybe you misunderstood my comment about "standing out." I just mean that he could be at the center of a potential Brown surge. That is, if Cornell were to return to the NCAA or make the NIT in '11-'12 that wouldn't as big a deal as Brown pulling it off.
|
gokinsmen
Postdoc
Posts: 2260
Reg: 02-06-10
|
05-09-10 10:56 PM - Post#83136
In response to gokinsmen
Brown has some nice looking guards coming in. And Albrecht will at least provide some scoring punch from 3. But I'm still not sold on Brown's front court (esp. the underclassmen). I know they racked up some nice point totals, but that was largely thanks to open layups from defensive breakdowns -- while teams were obsessed with guarding Mullery. I don't know how they'll create their own shots without him. Also, Halpern and Matt Sullivan shot just 37% and 34% from the field, respectively. Leffelman and McCarthy are very promising, but again, I haven't yet seen an ability to create on their own.
|
Bruno
Masters Student
Posts: 689
Loc: Brooklyn, NY
Reg: 11-21-04
|
05-10-10 10:00 AM - Post#83149
In response to gokinsmen
I agree with this concern. With the incoming crew, Albrecht included, this looks like it's becoming a backcourt-driven team.
Andrew McCarthy is a very nice complimentary player, but probably not a feature player, at least not yet. We are completely without bulk down low. 6'5 Peter Sullivan is our weightiest guy "down low" who will be a meaningful contributor. Ponticelli adds some size and strength, but he strikes me as more of an outside-in player than inside-out. Certainly Halpern is outside-in.
Chris Taylor isn't much of a presence down there. He has some size, but that's about it, and I don't see him as a factor, regardless of whether or not Jesse puts him in the starting lineup, which he may have to simply out of a lack of big enough bodies.
| LET'S go BRU-no (duh. nuh. nuh-nuh-nuh) |
|
mrjames
Postdoc
Posts: 3005
Loc: New York, NY
Reg: 11-21-04
|
05-10-10 02:48 PM - Post#83163
In response to Bruno
The Ivy League is getting very, very small. With Mullery and Foote gone, the list of quality big men includes a lot of guys who are 6'6 to 6'8 and very few above that height.
Then, if you narrow it down to guys that are true big men, what does the league have returning?
Sands, Eggleston, Mangano, McCarthy, Howlett and Wright are probably the only true ones with a bunch of swingmen like Casey, Maddox, Sullivan and Halpern vaguely faking it.
In other words, if you can find a dominant big man, you'll have a nice advantage in most games, but given how weak that position is in the league, there is no reason you can't be competitive without one.
|
pennhoops
Postdoc
Posts: 2118
Reg: 11-21-04
|
05-10-10 03:15 PM - Post#83169
In response to mrjames
The Ivy League is getting very, very small. With Mullery and Foote gone, the list of quality big men includes a lot of guys who are 6'6 to 6'8 and very few above that height.
Getting small? The League is tiny, period. When was the last time there was a true All Ivy center? You have to go back to 03 to find more than one big on the list and they were both PFs: Onyekwe and Nuualiitia. Guys like Wallace and Dom Martin were Princeton centers not interior presences. It's been a decade plus since you had Owens and Yanke in the League... until Foote. And I suspect it'll be a while until there's another competent true center. (Unless Malcolm Gilbert decides he really likes Penn.)
|
Silver Maple
PhD Student
Posts: 1976
Loc: Westfield, New Jersey
Reg: 11-23-04
|
05-10-10 03:16 PM - Post#83170
In response to mrjames
I'll go further and say that, in order to compete for Ivy titles on a consistent basis over a long period of time, a coach must assume that he's going to have little or nothing to work with that's over 6-8 and plan accordingly. Look at how many Princeton and Penn teams have dominated the league while topping out at 6-7 or so. I'm not saying there aren't exceptions-- we can all name them-- but there so few really good big players, as opposed to medium-sized and smaller players, available to Ivy coaches, that they need to be realistic about having that aircraft carrier that every coach would love to have in the middle.
I'd be willing to bet that if somebody did an analysis of the last 20 or so years, the Ivy league champ would turn out not to be the tallest team in the conference in most seasons.
|
