Untitled Document
Brown Columbia Cornell Dartmouth Harvard Penn Princeton Yale



Username Post: Tonite vs. Harvard        (Topic#18695)
Cvonvorys 
Postdoc
Posts: 4518
Cvonvorys
Loc: Princeton, New Jersey
Reg: 10-11-06
02-06-16 11:27 AM - Post#200982    

Looks like Penn is a one-point dog tonight vs. Harvard. Also looks like no Zena for Harvard.

 
Cvonvorys 
Postdoc
Posts: 4518
Cvonvorys
Loc: Princeton, New Jersey
Reg: 10-11-06
02-06-16 03:43 PM - Post#201005    
    In response to Cvonvorys

I take that back... Checking out the game on ESPN.com, and they're showing Penn is favored by one...

 
13otto 
Masters Student
Posts: 779
13otto
Loc: Philadelphia, PA
Reg: 11-22-04
02-06-16 03:52 PM - Post#201008    
    In response to Cvonvorys

It's been nearly 7 years (Feb. 21, 2009) since the last time Penn was favored over Harvard.
http://www.letsgoquakers.com/


 
HARVARDDADGRAD 
Postdoc
Posts: 2700

Loc: New Jersey
Reg: 01-21-14
02-06-16 03:56 PM - Post#201009    
    In response to 13otto

Does ESPN reflect whether Zena or Cummins are playing?

 
PennFan10 
Postdoc
Posts: 3590

Reg: 02-15-15
02-06-16 08:51 PM - Post#201043    
    In response to HARVARDDADGRAD

Cunning playing Zena not dressed. Penn leading at half 27-25.

 
Cvonvorys 
Postdoc
Posts: 4518
Cvonvorys
Loc: Princeton, New Jersey
Reg: 10-11-06
02-06-16 09:01 PM - Post#201044    
    In response to PennFan10

DNH leading the way with 8 points and 6 rebounds...

 
penn nation 
Professor
Posts: 21298

Reg: 12-02-04
02-06-16 09:07 PM - Post#201047    
    In response to Cvonvorys

We're really going to miss him next year. He has been excellent around the hoop tonight.

 
penn nation 
Professor
Posts: 21298

Reg: 12-02-04
02-06-16 09:24 PM - Post#201050    
    In response to penn nation

Once again a lot of ticky tack fouls on Penn. Meanwhile Penn getting hammered down the other end with nothing being called.

 
penn nation 
Professor
Posts: 21298

Reg: 12-02-04
02-06-16 09:29 PM - Post#201052    
    In response to penn nation

JD been setting up way too deep on his last couple of 3 attempts.

 
penn nation 
Professor
Posts: 21298

Reg: 12-02-04
02-06-16 09:33 PM - Post#201053    
    In response to penn nation

Most interesting thing about the later stages of this game, besides Howard and DNH looking great, is that SD has Foreman running the point and Silpe is on the bench.

 
penn nation 
Professor
Posts: 21298

Reg: 12-02-04
02-06-16 09:41 PM - Post#201054    
    In response to penn nation

Finally has Jake back in there although not exactly a confidence builder at the FT line.

 
penn nation 
Professor
Posts: 21298

Reg: 12-02-04
02-06-16 09:50 PM - Post#201057    
    In response to penn nation

We will probably pull it out, but we continue to have problems knowing how to seal a lead.

 
weinhauers_ghost 
Postdoc
Posts: 2144

Age: 64
Loc: New York City
Reg: 12-14-09
02-06-16 10:01 PM - Post#201059    
    In response to penn nation

Rothschild had a nice game. 14 points and 10 boards.

 
Cvonvorys 
Postdoc
Posts: 4518
Cvonvorys
Loc: Princeton, New Jersey
Reg: 10-11-06
02-06-16 11:28 PM - Post#201070    
    In response to weinhauers_ghost

Three Penn players tonight with double-doubles (DNH, Matt Howard, & Max R). Anyone know when the last time that happened?

 
Quakers03 
Professor
Posts: 12533

Reg: 12-07-04
Tonite vs. Harvard
02-06-16 11:32 PM - Post#201071    
    In response to weinhauers_ghost

Silpe was on the bench because of the officials, not Foreman. The spectrum of Darnell Foreman is as great as you'll see. He'll make two of the worst decisions possible and then throw a bullet pass to Rothschild for a layup after getting caught in the air. We will sorely miss DNH but it's really nice to see Max's game develop.

I'm shocked at how mediocre Harvard is without Endoswoman. You can see something in the two freshman and that McCarthy neck takedown of Jackson had been building, but they looked like the 1-5 team they are. Brick after brick leading to an insane rebounding advantage. The turnovers were bad again and having three turnovers while trying to inbound the ball and seal the game is unacceptable, but beating Tommy is very contenting.

 
penn nation 
Professor
Posts: 21298

Reg: 12-02-04
Re: Tonite vs. Harvard
02-06-16 11:38 PM - Post#201073    
    In response to Quakers03

They should have had Howard or someone with a bit more length and height inbound. The smaller guards were having great difficulty.

Everything was going in tonight for the big men--nice to see. Beats having to rely on the '3' which far more often than not, at least for this squad, is not a winning proposition.

 
Buckeye Quake 
PhD Student
Posts: 1601

Reg: 11-21-04
Re: Tonite vs. Harvard
02-07-16 12:27 AM - Post#201076    
    In response to Quakers03


Can I borrow the lens you seem to be looking through that makes you think Silpe is so much better than or any less prone to mistakes than Foreman? Not sure what their comparative numbers were tonight but I would imagine they were similar. While defensively I'd have to give the nod to Foreman.

 
Buckeye Quake 
PhD Student
Posts: 1601

Reg: 11-21-04
Re: Tonite vs. Harvard
02-07-16 12:37 AM - Post#201078    
    In response to Buckeye Quake

Just looked at the boxscore and the numbers tonight don't really support my theory. Regardless I still don't believe there's a signifigant difference.

 
Quakers03 
Professor
Posts: 12533

Reg: 12-07-04
Tonite vs. Harvard
02-07-16 12:56 AM - Post#201080    
    In response to Buckeye Quake

Not sure what I said tonight that was positive about Jake other than he was on the bench in foul trouble and not a coaches decision, but yes I do think Silpe needs to play more than Darnell. The biggest difference between the two is that Jake makes these mistakes with less than 400 minutes under his belt while Darnell has 900. I have to think that the advanced stats support him as well. The assist to turnover ratio this year sure does.

 
Cvonvorys 
Postdoc
Posts: 4518
Cvonvorys
Loc: Princeton, New Jersey
Reg: 10-11-06
02-07-16 01:57 AM - Post#201082    
    In response to Quakers03

Quick question: if I had posted that Chuck Daly visited me in a dream last night and told me that Penn would win by 10 and three Penn players would record double-doubles, you would think I had 1-2 too many Stolis...

Big win tonight!!!!

 
Charlie Fog 
Masters Student
Posts: 587

Age: 55
Loc: Philly
Reg: 11-12-13
Tonite vs. Harvard
02-07-16 08:35 AM - Post#201087    
    In response to Cvonvorys

Nice weekend sweep. I am looking forward to watching this program develop under Steve D.

Edited by Charlie Fog on 02-07-16 08:36 AM. Reason for edit: No reason given.

 
palestra38 
Professor
Posts: 32891

Reg: 11-21-04
Re: Tonite vs. Harvard
02-07-16 09:58 AM - Post#201092    
    In response to Charlie Fog

It's showing that there was indeed an opportunity this year had we not lost the players we lost. Certainly, Princeton and Brown were winnable games.


But for the future, I hope it is for the best.

 
mbaprof 
Senior
Posts: 346

Age: 67
Reg: 12-24-11
02-07-16 10:29 AM - Post#201096    
    In response to Cvonvorys

Harvard decimated by injuries, good thing Laurent Rivard (who now lives and works in Philly) was sitting behind the bench, otherwise H might have come all the way back on 3 threes when we kept turning the ball over. I was sitting right behind the failed in bounds and I dont understand why we didnt have a bigger guy doing it since Steeves was blocking all paths in for Foreman and Silpe.

But anytime beating Tommy is priceless!

 
penn nation 
Professor
Posts: 21298

Reg: 12-02-04
Re: Tonite vs. Harvard
02-07-16 11:21 AM - Post#201099    
    In response to palestra38

  • palestra38 Said:
Certainly, Princeton and Brown were winnable games.




That Princeton loss really looms large--changes the entire complexion of the Ivy race. And Princeton was thoroughly outplayed, not simply a matter of a game being winnable.

 
PennFan10 
Postdoc
Posts: 3590

Reg: 02-15-15
02-07-16 11:36 AM - Post#201102    
    In response to mbaprof

The designated inbounder is Max. Donahue had him off the floor because Harvard was fouling and his FT% is below 50. He had to pick his poison. Point guards are supposed to be good passers. It's usually a safe bet to have them inbound the ball.

 
Penn7277 
PhD Student
Posts: 1365

Loc: Lancaster, PA
Reg: 11-21-04
02-07-16 12:11 PM - Post#201107    
    In response to PennFan10

One solution might be to have Max practice his free throws — a lot!!! Also, it might not be a bad idea to get someone to help him and anyone else who is having such trouble with the fundamentals of the free throw. Having said that I doubt I could make one under pressure to save my life.

 
penn nation 
Professor
Posts: 21298

Reg: 12-02-04
02-07-16 12:14 PM - Post#201108    
    In response to PennFan10

At some point you have to recognize that your tactics need to change with repeated turnovers.

Going forward you have to figure that Penn opponents will pick up on this, so they should practice this with MH.

Either that, or hope that MR's FT% picks up. If not this year, with hard work, perhaps down the road. Hey, it worked with DNH.

 
PennFan10 
Postdoc
Posts: 3590

Reg: 02-15-15
02-07-16 12:15 PM - Post#201109    
    In response to Penn7277

I would bet they are practicing FTs.

 
UPIA1968 
PhD Student
Posts: 1122
UPIA1968
Loc: Cornwall, PA
Reg: 11-20-06
02-07-16 09:50 PM - Post#201132    
    In response to PennFan10

Some things to add. I suspect the increase in turnovers is because Steve is emphasizing the inside passing and penetration more, recognizing that this team is not going to beat anyone from three. They remain 324th in the country in that regard.

Also, I want him to keep playing Silpe over Foreman because Jake is always looking to pass while Darnell tends to put his head down and go to the hole.

This weekend will be very revealing. So far Penn has played even with four of the five Ivy teams. Should they do so at Cornell and Columbia, that would be a major sign of improvement.

As to the Freshmen. Max is really coming on - Jackson had proven that he belongs and Jake is a bit of judgement away from being a very nice young point guard. True, the absence of the two starters in the backcourt last year is giving Jake and, especially Jackson, time, but they are holding their own. As to Max, he has benefited from Auger's injury, but he has outplayed Auger anyway. If this front court freshman next year can play the team will not miss DNH as much as I fear.

One other point. This should be a contending year with DNH, Tony and Howard as upper classmen. The failure to develop this core, and surround it with good role players is Jerome's big failure. In the same way, Miller's failure to maintain the program's emotional strength under the pressure of all those injuries was his undoing. It is not always pure recruiting or game skill that makes a winner.

Finally, We have Auger out, Woods gone and Hicks gone, three players expected to start this year. Either absences are now a normal part of college BB or Penn continues to experience very bad luck. The program is the Joe Btfsplk of NCAAM. For those of you younger than 60, Joe Btfsplk was a cartoon character (Lt'l Abner) from the fifties who walked around with a constant thunderstorm around his head.

In parting - am I the only die hard who is starting to enjoy watching Penn play again?

 
Ted 
Junior
Posts: 222

Reg: 12-23-12
02-07-16 10:25 PM - Post#201134    
    In response to UPIA1968

No, you're not the only one. Last night's game was the most enjoyable one I've been to in a loooong time. Still a ways to go, of course, but as far as the overall cohesion of the team, it's like night and day compared to the the previous few years. Slowly but surely, hope is returning. Rothschild has been quite a pleasant surprise, as has Jackson Donahue - and these weren't even Steve's guys. Just a little bit better foul shooting, and we're 4-1 in the Ivies, instead of 2-3. These guys look like they're having fun.

 
Buckeye Quake 
PhD Student
Posts: 1601

Reg: 11-21-04
02-07-16 10:28 PM - Post#201135    
    In response to UPIA1968


Did you happen to notice the clutch assists Foreman had to Max down the stretch? Or maybe it's you with your head down. Then again you usually do have a tendency to see what you want to see.

 
SRP 
Postdoc
Posts: 4919

Reg: 02-04-06
02-07-16 11:52 PM - Post#201137    
    In response to Buckeye Quake

I saw the second half. It was interesting watching McCarthy and Silpe go head to head, two talented freshmen thrown into the deep end because of personnel surprises. And it was nice to see DNH look good against somebody else for a change. He had the footwork going.

 
penn nation 
Professor
Posts: 21298

Reg: 12-02-04
02-08-16 12:04 AM - Post#201138    
    In response to SRP

  • SRP Said:
And it was nice to see DNH look good against somebody else for a change. He had the footwork going.



His touch was also outstanding. No missed bunnies.


 
PennFan10 
Postdoc
Posts: 3590

Reg: 02-15-15
02-08-16 12:11 AM - Post#201139    
    In response to penn nation

This is a fun team to watch because they play with passion and energy. Nobody told them they are supposed to lose. They go out and compete.

 
10Q 
Professor
Posts: 23523

Loc: Suburban Philly
Reg: 11-21-04
02-08-16 08:37 AM - Post#201147    
    In response to PennFan10

Glad to hear all this enthusiasm. If this keeps up, I may have to tune back in. Seriously, I hate feeling so blah about my Quakers.

 
Penn90 
Masters Student
Posts: 575
Penn90
Reg: 11-22-04
02-08-16 09:46 AM - Post#201154    
    In response to UPIA1968

They look much better than when I saw them lose at George Mason. I loved how SD subbed in 5 new players down 8-0 and they responded (of course, the starting 5 is another matter).

I also really liked how DNH got on track in the second half. Silpe looked much more confident. The entire offense, really, had direction. Now they just need to improve the talent level.
Leges sine moribus vanae


 
SomeGuy 
Professor
Posts: 6415

Reg: 11-22-04
02-08-16 03:11 PM - Post#201183    
    In response to penn nation

it also appeared to me that they were using him differently this weekend. he caught the ball on the move a lot more.

 
LocusBB 
Sophomore
Posts: 119

Age: 52
Reg: 07-27-13
02-08-16 11:52 PM - Post#201216    
    In response to UPIA1968

Just looked at the Stats all the grief about Matt Howard 3 point percentage, now he leads the team. He is clearly the most efficient player on this team. This guy needs more shots and plays run for him.

 
Icon Legend Permissions Topic Options
Report Post

Quote Post

Quick Reply

Print Topic

Email Topic

3070 Views





Copyright © 2004-2012 Basketball U. Terms of Use for our Site and Privacy Policy are applicable to you. All rights reserved.
Basketball U. and its subsidiaries are not affiliated in any way with any NCAA athletic conference or member institution.
FusionBB™ Version 2.1 | ©2003-2007 InteractivePHP, Inc.
Execution time: 0.124 seconds.   Total Queries: 8   Zlib Compression is on.
All times are (GMT -0500) Eastern. Current time is 01:37 PM
Top