Untitled Document
Brown Columbia Cornell Dartmouth Harvard Penn Princeton Yale



 Page 1 of 2 ALL12
Username Post: KenPom 2018        (Topic#20577)
cc66 
Postdoc
Posts: 2203

Reg: 10-09-09
10-23-17 01:00 PM - Post#234394    

We debut at 211, 5th in the IL, just above Cornell at 213, but far behind Penn at 144. Yale 84, Princeton 88, and Harvard 126 lead the way.

The projection for the year is 12-15, 6-8 in IL. Note that we are suppose to lose 6 of the first 7 games, all of which are on the road, including the first against Villanova, by 26 points.

 
cc66 
Postdoc
Posts: 2203

Reg: 10-09-09
10-23-17 01:12 PM - Post#234398    
    In response to cc66

correction to the above: Harvard is at 110.

 
mrjames 
Professor
Posts: 6062

Loc: Montclair, NJ
Reg: 11-21-04
10-23-17 01:13 PM - Post#234399    
    In response to cc66

Columbia is far more fairly judged at KP than at Bart Torvik's site. This makes far more sense than the 280s that Bart had.

That 144 for Penn seems high. Not ridiculous, but high...

 
cc66 
Postdoc
Posts: 2203

Reg: 10-09-09
10-23-17 02:04 PM - Post#234405    
    In response to mrjames

Yes, it sounds as if Torvik completely discounted the first years.

If Faulds comes on like many talented bigs do by the the beginning of the Ivy season, then our interior defense will tighten up considerably (KP has us at DRAT 103, up from last year, but still not very good), and we might pull out one or two extra wins. As to Penn, I was thinking closer to KP 175.

 
mrjames 
Professor
Posts: 6062

Loc: Montclair, NJ
Reg: 11-21-04
10-23-17 02:25 PM - Post#234410    
    In response to cc66

Technically, he has you guys even on defense (marginally worse on rank) than last year (he reset his efficiency baseline to 101 from the 104-105 that it's been recently).

But yeah... I have Columbia's incoming class as the most productive on an expected Win Shares basis over four years of any 2017 cohort. Still less than half the expected win shares of the Harvard 2016 cohort, but strongest of this year, nonetheless. Would expect production out of that class that Columbia is not currently being credited for.

 
Chet Forte 
Postdoc
Posts: 2967

Reg: 03-02-08
10-23-17 04:49 PM - Post#234431    
    In response to mrjames

And we were picked for 7th or 8th in football. I guess that’s why we play the games. The buzz I am getting is that Mike Smith is poised for a monster sophomore season. See, e.g., one Josh Wainwright.


 
Columbia 37P6 
Postdoc
Posts: 2173

Reg: 02-14-06
10-23-17 06:13 PM - Post#234440    
    In response to Chet Forte

How could a Columbia wide receiver (Ronald Smith) end up with a broken jaw without a penalty being called on the defender?

 
cc66 
Postdoc
Posts: 2203

Reg: 10-09-09
supporting evidence on Smith
10-23-17 07:24 PM - Post#234443    
    In response to Chet Forte

http://www.gocolumbialions.com/SportSelect.dbml?DB...

 
SomeGuy 
Professor
Posts: 6404

Reg: 11-22-04
10-23-17 11:46 PM - Post#234452    
    In response to mrjames

Apologies if I am repeating myself here, but Columbia is complicated for this type of prediction this year. They have enough returnees that you could see how one could ignore the freshmen entirely and fill the available minutes. If your model presumes that, though, Columbia would appear likely o get worse. Statistically, they lose 3 of their top 4 players by ORAT, and they lose 2 of the guys with their top 4 usage rates (both with decent ORATs. So you could easily look at Columbia, replace the departing efficient guys with less efficient players who are already in the rotation, and end up with that 288 ranking.

Obviously, the freshmen could understandably be presumed to be better than the returnees in terms of ORATs, which could significantly change the analysis.

Cornell is the opposite-- the loss of Hatter gives his high usage low ORAT possessions to more efficient guys off the bench, so they are presumed to improve in some models.

 
SRP 
Postdoc
Posts: 4910

Reg: 02-04-06
10-24-17 05:25 AM - Post#234453    
    In response to SomeGuy

It would hardly be an Ivy season without uncertainty about the EnigmaLions. Usually this lasts well into the season.

 
Columbia 37P6 
Postdoc
Posts: 2173

Reg: 02-14-06
10-27-17 03:39 PM - Post#234848    
    In response to SRP

I feel that Mr. James has it right--this year's freshman class will be very productive.

 
nycivybball 
Pre-Frosh
Posts: 5

Reg: 12-16-16
10-29-17 05:14 PM - Post#234936    
    In response to Columbia 37P6

Stopped by practice the other day. Guys are playing really hard. Engles seems to emphasizing defense and playing at a faster pace. Smith and Castlin looked really good. Adlesh and Tape look like they're ready to take on bigger roles this year.

With the freshmen, Gabe Stefanini and Jaron Faulds seemed the most comfortable. Hard not to like Stefanini's game.

Injury wise, Shane Eberle was out with a knee problem. Doesn't seem too serious. Jake Klores is out recovering from shoulder surgery. Doesn't know if he'll be ready to play this season or not. CJ Davis was not at practice

 
internetter 
Postdoc
Posts: 3400

Loc: Los Angeles
Reg: 11-21-04
10-29-17 07:58 PM - Post#234939    
    In response to nycivybball

Read somewhere that Davis is out for the year, will stay in school.
west coast fan


 
internetter 
Postdoc
Posts: 3400

Loc: Los Angeles
Reg: 11-21-04
10-29-17 08:26 PM - Post#234941    
    In response to internetter

Spec:

Basketball’s junior guard C.J. Davis is out for the year after suffering a stress fracture in his back a season ago.
Davis was a highly touted recruit for former head coach Kyle Smith, and has flashed signs of his potential at the point guard position, but last year, struggled to get consistent minutes under current head coach Jim Engles. He saw action in 24 games last season, averaging 3.4 points per game and played in 32 games as a first-year.

Davis has suffered injuries in the past, according to Engles, having played through a stress fracture last season.

“He kept saying his back hurt and that pain was going down his leg, but he kept playing,” Engles said. “He toughed it out for the year.”

As Davis has decided to remain enrolled at Columbia while he recovers this year, he will lose a year of athletic eligibility according to the Ivy League regulations. He faces a similar challenge that senior guard Kyle Castlin experienced last year when he missed the entire season to recover from a toe injury.

“When we found out exactly how serious the injury was, it was tough, because he had to make a tough decision,” Engles said. “Hopefully, he’ll be able to progress naturally and be able to get on the court at some point over the summer and be back with us next year.”


ally.mcdonough@columbiaspectat or.com |



west coast fan


 
LionFan 
Senior
Posts: 398

Reg: 11-07-06
10-30-17 09:21 AM - Post#234969    
    In response to internetter

Seems to me the key issue is among the bigs. Not only does Engles have to find a couple of centers from among Tape, Faulds and Eberle, he also has to find a backup for Meisner at the forward spot. I don't see anyone other than Brumant on the roster for that position. The 6'10" plus kids aren't fast and quick enough to fill the spot effectively. And everyone else other than Brumant seems to be a guard/wing or point guard type. Is there someone I'm overlooking? And has Eberle improved enough to be in the mix this year? His big body could be very helpful.

 
hoopsfan 
Masters Student
Posts: 644

Reg: 12-26-04
10-30-17 10:50 AM - Post#234997    
    In response to LionFan

You have hit on a good question. I would not be surprised under some circumstances to see Myles Hanson play the 4.

 
Columbia 37P6 
Postdoc
Posts: 2173

Reg: 02-14-06
10-30-17 10:51 AM - Post#234998    
    In response to LionFan

Myles Hanson is listed at 6'6" 215 so he clearly can play up front. Although Rodney Hunter is only 6'5" he's strong and athletic and therefore quite capable of playing the forward position. I agree with you that the key issue is the development of the bigs, but we have known that all along. Our rebounding and interior defense has been bad for years so the change in personnel is bound to be an improvement. Hopefully, the mindset of the newcomers is to play tough underneath.

 
Chet Forte 
Postdoc
Posts: 2967

Reg: 03-02-08
10-30-17 04:35 PM - Post#235061    
    In response to Columbia 37P6

Last year Rodney’s issue was his shooting. Has he improved in that regard?


 
Chet Forte 
Postdoc
Posts: 2967

Reg: 03-02-08
10-30-17 04:54 PM - Post#235066    
    In response to Columbia 37P6

Last year Rodney’s issue was his shooting. Has he improved in that regard?


 
Columbia 37P6 
Postdoc
Posts: 2173

Reg: 02-14-06
10-30-17 06:33 PM - Post#235072    
    In response to Chet Forte

I assume he has improved his outside shot, but his skills set last year was clearly that of someone who should be playing near the basket. We need to remember that although Hunter was a sophomore last year, essentially it was his freshman season as he did not play on the varsity his first year at Columbia. I would not be surprised at all if he becomes one of our best players this season and next.

 
 Page 1 of 2 ALL12
Icon Legend Permissions Topic Options
Report Post

Quote Post

Quick Reply

Print Topic

Email Topic

2873 Views




Copyright © 2004-2012 Basketball U. Terms of Use for our Site and Privacy Policy are applicable to you. All rights reserved.
Basketball U. and its subsidiaries are not affiliated in any way with any NCAA athletic conference or member institution.
FusionBB™ Version 2.1 | ©2003-2007 InteractivePHP, Inc.
Execution time: 1.154 seconds.   Total Queries: 16   Zlib Compression is on.
All times are (GMT -0500) Eastern. Current time is 01:02 AM
Top