Untitled Document
Brown Columbia Cornell Dartmouth Harvard Penn Princeton Yale



 Page 3 of 4 ALL« First<1234
Username Post: We've Moved up to a 15th Seed!        (Topic#21044)
penn nation 
Professor
Posts: 21193

Reg: 12-02-04
02-26-18 04:33 PM - Post#249635    
    In response to palestra38

They've gotten destroyed twice by Bucknell, the regular season champ.

 
palestra38 
Professor
Posts: 32803

Reg: 11-21-04
02-26-18 04:43 PM - Post#249640    
    In response to penn nation

3rd time's a charm

 
mrjames 
Professor
Posts: 6062

Loc: Montclair, NJ
Reg: 11-21-04
02-26-18 05:50 PM - Post#249647    
    In response to Silver Maple

Dayton will be key to watch. Right now, Penn's projected resume (pre-Ivy Tourney) is:

Quad1 (site adj Top 50): 0-1
Quad2 (site adj Top 100): 1-2
Quad3: 4-3
Quad4: 17-1

Dayton is BARELY hanging on as a Quad2 win and could easily fall to a Quad3. The Ivy Tourney would add, at best, one more Quad3 and one more Quad4 win (easily could be two more Quad4 wins).

It's NCSOS is 278.

That to me feels like a 15. With a loss this weekend, it might even tip to being a 16 without some real conf tourney damage elsewhere.

If Dayton falls off the Quad2 line, you could make an argument that if both teams win out and meet in the IL Tourney final, Harvard would have a stronger resume for selection than Penn as the Ivy rep.

 
Streamers 
Professor
Posts: 8220
Streamers
Loc: NW Philadelphia
Reg: 11-21-04
02-26-18 06:00 PM - Post#249652    
    In response to mrjames

Wins over Toledo and LaSalle or beating Temple would have made 14 or 13 with luck a win-out scenario, but as it is... Mike pretty well summed it up.

 
penn nation 
Professor
Posts: 21193

Reg: 12-02-04
02-26-18 06:05 PM - Post#249654    
    In response to Streamers

Yes. Or, for that matter, beating Harvard in Allston as a potentially undefeated IL season and very long winning streak to end the year would have helped seeding as well.

 
Cvonvorys 
Postdoc
Posts: 4471
Cvonvorys
Loc: Princeton, New Jersey
Reg: 10-11-06
02-26-18 06:23 PM - Post#249657    
    In response to penn nation

Not for nothing, but did anyone actually expect us to be having this conversation back in November?

I went back and looked up my hopes for their first game against Fairfield, but in effect it was my hope for the entire season:

1) Brodeur and Betley picking up where they left off last year.

2) Brodeur and Rothschild playing well while on the floor together.

3) Woods living up to P38's expectations.

4) Wood eliminating his TO problem and draining 3-pointer after 3-pointer.

5) Foreman, relieved of any scoring burden, becoming the quintessential point guard.

6) The freshmen getting some playing time and showing off their potential.

7) Contribution from an unexpected source.

Rather prescient on my part, especially regarding Caleb, don't you think?

 
mrjames 
Professor
Posts: 6062

Loc: Montclair, NJ
Reg: 11-21-04
02-26-18 06:27 PM - Post#249658    
    In response to Streamers

Funny thing is that, how the quadrants work, only Temple would have definitely helped, as that's a solid Quad2 game. La Salle is surprisingly enough a Quad4 game (it's that only Penn Quad4 loss).

Toledo would be darn close to Quad2, which would be helpful, but is borderline much like Dayton.

All would have helped the overall RPI number, for sure, but in terms of adding a quality win, only Temple would have been for sure.

 
penn nation 
Professor
Posts: 21193

Reg: 12-02-04
02-26-18 06:30 PM - Post#249659    
    In response to mrjames

  • mrjames Said:

All would have helped the overall RPI number, for sure, but in terms of adding a quality win, only Temple would have been for sure.



Besides 'Nova at 'Nova (or its cubby hole, anyways)




 
penn nation 
Professor
Posts: 21193

Reg: 12-02-04
02-26-18 06:57 PM - Post#249662    
    In response to mrjames

  • mrjames Said:

If Dayton falls off the Quad2 line, you could make an argument that if both teams win out and meet in the IL Tourney final, Harvard would have a stronger resume for selection than Penn as the Ivy rep.



The only reason for that would be losing to higher ranked teams which doesn't say very much for one's resume.

It certainly wouldn't be due to any actual wins on Harvard's part. Other than beating Penn, its best victories have come vs St Joseph's (#184) which Penn has also beaten, Yale (#200, and ditto) and then you're down to BU (#223).


 
10Q 
Professor
Posts: 23360

Loc: Suburban Philly
Reg: 11-21-04
02-26-18 07:06 PM - Post#249664    
    In response to Cvonvorys

I predicted 14 and 0.

 
TheLine 
Professor
Posts: 5597

Age: 60
Reg: 07-07-09
02-26-18 07:09 PM - Post#249665    
    In response to penn nation

Harvard's signature win is against Penn. So yeah, I'm failing to see how that makes Harvard more attractive.


 
mrjames 
Professor
Posts: 6062

Loc: Montclair, NJ
Reg: 11-21-04
02-26-18 07:24 PM - Post#249668    
    In response to TheLine

You have to think of it through the eyes of the committee. Their tools give them limited data to go on in order to make decisions between the auto-bid seeds. What they look for first is Quad1 and Quad2 wins. At the 14/15/16, merely having any can be a differentiator. And in this case, Harvard would have 1 (at Penn, which would be ~125 if it wins out and loses to Harvard) and Penn would have zero (again Dayton could hang on, though). Penn beating Harvard in the IL Tourney final wouldn’t help Penn on that front, because it would only be a Quad3 game for them.

Then, they look at RPI and SOS/NCSOS. Harvard would be slightly better in the RPI as champ than Penn (~100 to ~110). It would be WAY better in SOS and NCSOS (right now around 150 in former and Top 100 in the latter). I think they’d both be 15s right now, regardless.

From an actual resume perspective (Wins Against Bubble or other strength of record measures), Penn has a much stronger resume than Harvard (and actually could be a borderline 13-seed case). There will be an SOR metric on the team sheets this year, but it’s unlikely that the committee will pay it much heed.

 
PennFan10 
Postdoc
Posts: 3584

Reg: 02-15-15
02-26-18 07:26 PM - Post#249669    
    In response to TheLine

Yea, Harvard’s resume better than Penn’s? I don’t see it. They lost to better teams but they really haven’t beat anybody.

 
penn nation 
Professor
Posts: 21193

Reg: 12-02-04
02-26-18 07:45 PM - Post#249672    
    In response to mrjames

Based on that convoluted bit of gymnastics worthy of an Olympic medal, I think I finally get why they call it March Madness.

  • mrjames Said:
You have to think of it through the eyes of the committee. Their tools give them limited data to go on in order to make decisions between the auto-bid seeds. What they look for first is Quad1 and Quad2 wins. At the 14/15/16, merely having any can be a differentiator. And in this case, Harvard would have 1 (at Penn, which would be ~125 if it wins out and loses to Harvard) and Penn would have zero (again Dayton could hang on, though). Penn beating Harvard in the IL Tourney final wouldn’t help Penn on that front, because it would only be a Quad3 game for them.

Then, they look at RPI and SOS/NCSOS. Harvard would be slightly better in the RPI as champ than Penn (~100 to ~110). It would be WAY better in SOS and NCSOS (right now around 150 in former and Top 100 in the latter). I think they’d both be 15s right now, regardless.

From an actual resume perspective (Wins Against Bubble or other strength of record measures), Penn has a much stronger resume than Harvard (and actually could be a borderline 13-seed case). There will be an SOR metric on the team sheets this year, but it’s unlikely that the committee will pay it much heed.




 
mrjames 
Professor
Posts: 6062

Loc: Montclair, NJ
Reg: 11-21-04
02-26-18 07:58 PM - Post#249674    
    In response to penn nation

How the committee makes decisions requires you to unlearn a lot of what you believe to be (and objectively is) reasonably true.

 
penn nation 
Professor
Posts: 21193

Reg: 12-02-04
02-26-18 08:39 PM - Post#249684    
    In response to mrjames

I would take that comment seriously if the selection committee was consistent and predictable.

But every year they find new and different ways to leave teams out.

 
Silver Maple 
Postdoc
Posts: 3770

Loc: Westfield, New Jersey
Reg: 11-23-04
02-26-18 10:22 PM - Post#249702    
    In response to penn nation

Well, that's consistency right there, yes?

 
penn nation 
Professor
Posts: 21193

Reg: 12-02-04
02-26-18 10:46 PM - Post#249706    
    In response to Silver Maple

You're 2 nights early for Purim.



 
penn nation 
Professor
Posts: 21193

Reg: 12-02-04
03-01-18 09:50 PM - Post#250086    
    In response to palestra38

  • palestra38 Said:
3rd time's a charm



We'll never know, as Navy gets knocked off by 11-18 Holy Cross in the first round.


 
SRP 
Postdoc
Posts: 4910

Reg: 02-04-06
03-02-18 11:26 PM - Post#250341    
    In response to penn nation

Carmody trying for another Patriot tournament miracle run.

 
 Page 3 of 4 ALL« First<1234
Icon Legend Permissions Topic Options
Report Post

Quote Post

Quick Reply

Print Topic

Email Topic

6459 Views





Copyright © 2004-2012 Basketball U. Terms of Use for our Site and Privacy Policy are applicable to you. All rights reserved.
Basketball U. and its subsidiaries are not affiliated in any way with any NCAA athletic conference or member institution.
FusionBB™ Version 2.1 | ©2003-2007 InteractivePHP, Inc.
Execution time: 0.733 seconds.   Total Queries: 16   Zlib Compression is on.
All times are (GMT -0500) Eastern. Current time is 01:51 AM
Top