Untitled Document
Brown Columbia Cornell Dartmouth Harvard Penn Princeton Yale



 Page 1 of 2 ALL12
Username Post: Brown Leads Columbia 36-29 at Halftime        (Topic#21146)
Columbia 37P6 
Postdoc
Posts: 2163

Reg: 02-14-06
02-10-18 08:09 PM - Post#247378    

Miserable first half performance by Columbia, but they are still in the game thanks to some decent outside shooting early on by Meissner and Smith. Columbia has committed ten turnovers so far as the Lions struggle to put points on the board without any contribution at all from their big men. Patrick Tape is not playing, probably due to the injury he sustained towards the end of last night's loss at Yale. Among the missing tonight are Hanson and Bibb, neither of whom played against Yale. For whatever reason, Castlin has played very little this weekend after playing so well last week. Hickman is again having a rough night, Is game has the earmarks of a blowout loss in the second half to Brown, but Meissner, Smith and Adlesh, are giving it their all so I would not rule a possible comeback win. Of course, that means Engles would have to use a different line-up for most of the second half--Meissner, Smith, Adlesh, Castlin and Stefani.

 
Murph 
Masters Student
Posts: 626

Age: 63
Reg: 09-13-11
02-10-18 09:25 PM - Post#247390    
    In response to Columbia 37P6

Wow. I’ve never actually seen that play work, where the free throw shooter intentionally misses the foul shot at the end of a game, in hopes that his team will get the rebound and hit a last second shot.

 
cc66 
Postdoc
Posts: 2201

Reg: 10-09-09
Brown Leads Columbia 36-29 at Halftime
02-10-18 09:28 PM - Post#247391    
    In response to Columbia 37P6

Lose 91-88 in OT despite 22 from Smith, 20 from Meisner and Stefanini, and 15 from Adlesh.

Tape could be seen on the bench with a wrapped left foot. We missed him inside.

There is a lot of talent on this team. The wins, however, aren't going to come until next year.

Edited by cc66 on 02-10-18 09:29 PM. Reason for edit: No reason given.

 
Columbia 37P6 
Postdoc
Posts: 2163

Reg: 02-14-06
02-10-18 10:44 PM - Post#247415    
    In response to cc66

cc66 don't give up yet. Despite the 3-5 record, we still have a reasonable chance of making the Ivy League Basketball Tournament this year. If my numbers are correct, we are now tied with Cornell and Princeton for fifth place, just one game behind Brown and Yale who are both 4-4. Dartmouth knocked off Princeton tonight by 16 points tonight so it is certainly possible that we could defeat Princeton at home next week. Also, the same Harvard team that we defeated, won against Penn. More than that, our two losses to Yale and Brown this weekend were both away games that could just as easily ended up as victories if Coach Engles had given more of Hickman's minutes to Stefanini. Tonight's #'s were 20 points in 27 minutes for Stefanini compared to 5 points in 22 minutes for Hickman. That's a huge disparity and clearly indicates that Engles must use Stefanini in the starting line-up instead of Hickman and then keep him on the floor for 30+ minutes. I believe Engles recognizes that now as the line-up he used for most of the second half against Brown was Smith, Stefanini, Meisner, Adlesh and Faulds/Castlin.

 
roarlionroar 
Freshman
Posts: 55

Age: 27
Reg: 02-05-14
02-10-18 11:43 PM - Post#247418    
    In response to Columbia 37P6

This was a horrible way to lose

 
internetter 
Postdoc
Posts: 3399

Loc: Los Angeles
Reg: 11-21-04
02-11-18 02:29 AM - Post#247423    
    In response to roarlionroar

Brown played several minutes toward the end without their injured standout FY, Cambridge. They also suffered as a result of a jumper that should have netted 3 instead of 2 in regulation time as it seemed clear the player was beyond the line (perhaps the refs didn't have a clear look).

Some of the Lions' passes were inexplicable, thrown with defenders between the two Cs.

west coast fan


 
Chet Forte 
Postdoc
Posts: 2958

Reg: 03-02-08
02-11-18 10:48 AM - Post#247430    
    In response to internetter

Obviously Engles is wedded to Hickman. He will keep giving him big minutes because he apparently sees something that nobody else does. So short of being ordered by Peter Pilling to play Stefanini in Hickman’s place we might as well content ourselves with the certain knowledge that Engles is one stubborn guy.


 
Chet Forte 
Postdoc
Posts: 2958

Reg: 03-02-08
02-11-18 12:02 PM - Post#247441    
    In response to Chet Forte

Tape would have made a big difference against Brown. Not having him last night was the difference between a W and an L despite my reservations about other aspects of our game. Brown would have had no answer to Tape’s length.


 
Columbia 37P6 
Postdoc
Posts: 2163

Reg: 02-14-06
02-11-18 01:35 PM - Post#247446    
    In response to Chet Forte

Here are the Columbia season stats:
http://www.gocolumbialions.com/fls/9600/Stats/MBB/...

Hickman is averaging 7.4 ppg for 26.7 mpg
Stefanini is averaging 6.1 ppg for 13.0 mpg

In summary, Stefanini is scoring at about twice Hickman's rate, meaning that the Lions are losing about six or seven points per game by not using Stefanini. Furthermore, Stefanini's field goal percentage and 3 point shooting percentage are both way above Hickman's. To be fair, Hickman is ahead of Stefanini in a few other categories such as free throw percentage, and the statistics do not show who is the better overall defender. However, from having watched all 21 Columbia basketball games this season, the impression I have is that Stefanini is a better defender than Hickman. Finally, the freshman, Stefanin, is improving substantially from game to game whereas the senior, Hickman, is not. In brief, I do respectfully submit that the Columbia coaching staff is making a serious mistake by not starting Stefanini and giving him much more playing time.









 
cc66 
Postdoc
Posts: 2201

Reg: 10-09-09
02-11-18 02:31 PM - Post#247452    
    In response to Columbia 37P6

There's only one remotely plausible explanation that I can think for Engles' continued reliance on Hickman, namely, that because Hickman is a senior, the coach feels that Hickman's 4 yr long commitment to the program obligates Engles to give him the benefit of the doubt (and most of the statistics). This seemingly curious preference might be especially true because Castlin, the only other senior on the squad, has been injured so much this year, and Engles wants to play the one senior who has stuck with it.

It's just a theory, but in the absence of any other competing hypothesis, it's the only one I've got.

 
Columbia 37P6 
Postdoc
Posts: 2163

Reg: 02-14-06
02-11-18 03:27 PM - Post#247459    
    In response to cc66

Maybe so, and a nice gesture if that, to a very good young man. However, I believe you would agree with me that the obligations of a head college basketball coach to everyone connected with his or her particular program, far transcend keeping one player happy. There are only six games remaining in the season and I feel that it is time for Columbia to put its strongest line-up on the floor regardless whether the players are seniors, juniors, sophomores or freshmen. Isn't that the way it's supposed to work?

 
Chet Forte 
Postdoc
Posts: 2958

Reg: 03-02-08
02-11-18 03:48 PM - Post#247460    
    In response to Columbia 37P6

Yes. Al Bagnoli puts his best players on the field. He played 15 or 20 first years if they were better than the guys in front of him. That’s what makes Al a great coach. We have four guys who were recruited by Engles who were high level prospects. Stefanini gets some minutes, Faulds less, Hanson even less, and Bibbs none. I am sure that Hickman is a great young man and an excellent athlete, but the simple fact is that he has been on a downward trajectory for over a year and is not helping the team when he is on the court. But as I said, I have a high degree of confidence that Engles couldn’t care less about the fan base.


 
cc66 
Postdoc
Posts: 2201

Reg: 10-09-09
02-11-18 04:31 PM - Post#247465    
    In response to Columbia 37P6

To be clear, my hypothesis was an explanation, not a defense. Of course, Steffanini should be playing double Hickman's minutes; other than respecting a senior, I can't figure out why he is not.

 
Columbia 37P6 
Postdoc
Posts: 2163

Reg: 02-14-06
02-11-18 05:52 PM - Post#247471    
    In response to cc66

A Doomsday scenario seem near unless Engles somehow turns things around in the next six games. We are now 3-5 in the League and 5-16 overall. Certainly, someone must care in the administration about what has happened the last two seasons. Are the few critics on this Board the only ones who care about Columbia Basketball? The next three weeks should be very interesting.

 
SomeGuy 
Professor
Posts: 6391

Reg: 11-22-04
02-11-18 06:20 PM - Post#247472    
    In response to cc66

I’ve given you guys some devil’s advocate arguments on this before — namely that Hickman very clearly appears to be the team’s leader in huddles, etc., that Stefanini turns it over way too much, which means he has to eat up an alarming number of possessions to get to the counting numbers you cite (which mean absolutely nothing if other guys use those possessions more efficiently when Hickman is on the floor), and that I think Stefanini’s style defensively involves a lot of gambling that makes him look good but leaves you wondering who missed the assignment a lot.

I’ll throw out one more. When Stefanini started last weekend, he was held scoreless. It is quite possible that Engles is making a decision to have Hickman absorb the more difficult stretches of the game when the opponent’s starters are in and fresh, and then Stefanini gets the more advantageous situations against backups and/or guys who are tired. That again makes Stefanini look good, but may mean that he won’t look as good in a starting role.

Just a theory. I also will point out that Columbia and Princeton are far and away the best offensive teams in the league this year. Columbia isn’t losing because Hickman is failing to score — it is losing because the defense is one of the 50 worst in the country, and right there with Cornell for worst in the conference. So whoever is willing and able to defend should be playing. To my eye, that’s Hickman over Stefanini, though frankly it might be Hunter at that spot overall.

 
cc66 
Postdoc
Posts: 2201

Reg: 10-09-09
02-11-18 07:14 PM - Post#247475    
    In response to SomeGuy

Yes, in general, it is more accurate to say that we are 5-16 because our defense is lousy than it is because we're missing a little more juice on offense. I assume that defense is going to be the primary off-season work, because 4 of 5 starters are coming back next year--Smith, Adlesh, Meisner, and Tape. Nevertheless, I am still not persuaded that your analysis explains Stefanini's 0 pt start, in part because the starters who you speculate might be tired did perfectly well defending against Hickman until the very moment he was sent to the bench.

 
SomeGuy 
Professor
Posts: 6391

Reg: 11-22-04
02-11-18 08:27 PM - Post#247481    
    In response to Chet Forte

I’ll also push back on this — i’m not sure the inside length advantage actually works to Columbia ‘s advantage against Brown. Certainly against Penn, it was Columbia’s movement disadvantage against Penn’s frontcourt that caused Tape and Faulds problems. Columbia had the size but couldn’t stay with Brodeur. Brown might present a similar issue despite giving up Height. Now in an OT game any additional juice helps. But that argument goes both ways — hard to know if OT happens at all if Brown’s best player is on the court down the stretch.


 
Old Bear 
Postdoc
Posts: 3988

Reg: 11-23-04
02-11-18 09:12 PM - Post#247487    
    In response to SomeGuy

Stefanini played 27 mins. against Brown, 20 pts, 1 TO, Hickman played 22, 5 pts. 2 TOs. Anderson 3 with 9 seconds was overcalled as a 2 in regular time (it was clearly a 3 (I've seen pictures) so there should not have been OT. Cambridge was 0-7 from 3, but 10 of 13 from 2 and scored 23 in 30 minutes, 3 slams including a 360. 49 pts. this weekend and 61 last weekend. I hope he can play next weekend.

 
Columbia 37P6 
Postdoc
Posts: 2163

Reg: 02-14-06
Brown Leads Columbia 36-29 at Halftime
02-11-18 09:46 PM - Post#247492    
    In response to Old Bear

Usually, I agree with SomeGuy, but he must have missed the Columbia vs. Yale and Columbia vs. Brown games this weekend. As Old Bear just noted, Stefanini played 27 minutes against Brown and scored 20 points with a single turnover, while Hickman's stats were 5 points and two turnovers in 22 minutes. On defense, even if Hickman was better than Stefanini which was not the case, that could not possibly make up for the 15 point scoring differential in favor of Stefanini. No one could reasonably argue that Hickmani played better than Stefanini in the Brown game. However, it's the Friday night game against Yale that really bothers me and I would respectfully suggest that SomeGuy take a look at the replay on the Ivy League Digital Network. In brief, Engles started Hickman against Yale rather than Stefanini and the Lions fell behind Yale by double digit points before Engles brought Stefanini off the bench about midway thru the first half. With him on the court, the Lions caught up with Yale and took the lead at halftime. In the second half, with Stefanini again on the bench, Yale quickly regained the lead and kept the lead until Engles once again substituted Stefanini whereupon the Lions caught up with Yale and nearly won the game. Stefanini also played solid defense while he was in the game. In retrospect, I think Columbia made two very costly mistakes not giving Stefanini, and for that matter, Castlin, more playing time against Yale and Brown this weekend.

Edited by Columbia 37P6 on 02-11-18 09:48 PM. Reason for edit: No reason given.

 
SomeGuy 
Professor
Posts: 6391

Reg: 11-22-04
Re: Brown Leads Columbia 36-29 at Halftime
02-11-18 10:40 PM - Post#247495    
    In response to Columbia 37P6

I watched the first half. Observations: Stefanini was +6 while on the floor, and Hickman was +4. Yes, Stefanini was in for the comeback from down 9 when he entered, but Hickman was on the floor for the whole comeback as well. Stefanini came in when Yale had Eric Monroe was in for Yale, and guarded him for the first stretch. He switched to guarding Copeland after he returned. Hickman generally had Oni. So the obvious question for starting Stefanini would be who would guard Oni/Cambridge/Betley/Town s/Stephens. A lot of tough guys to guard there for Stefanini, Adlesh, and Smith.

 
 Page 1 of 2 ALL12
Icon Legend Permissions Topic Options
Report Post

Quote Post

Quick Reply

Print Topic

Email Topic

2676 Views




Copyright © 2004-2012 Basketball U. Terms of Use for our Site and Privacy Policy are applicable to you. All rights reserved.
Basketball U. and its subsidiaries are not affiliated in any way with any NCAA athletic conference or member institution.
FusionBB™ Version 2.1 | ©2003-2007 InteractivePHP, Inc.
Execution time: 0.258 seconds.   Total Queries: 16   Zlib Compression is on.
All times are (GMT -0500) Eastern. Current time is 04:40 PM
Top