Untitled Document
Brown Columbia Cornell Dartmouth Harvard Penn Princeton Yale



 Page 1 of 2 ALL12
Username Post: Let's talk about how deep this team really is        (Topic#21150)
Streamers 
Postdoc
Posts: 2561
Streamers
Loc: NW Philadelphia
Reg: 11-21-04
02-11-18 01:28 PM - Post#247444    

This weekend has raised the question across several threads as to whether this team is deep enough for the Ivy February grind (nearly all of it on the road for Penn) and whether SD going to a 7 man rotation is a good idea.

Max's injury and Wood's funk (I suspect there is something wrong physically there too - shooters of his quality don't hoist air balls from good looks for no reason) really drive home the point.

We all thought going in this team would be quite deep. Then, for various reasons, Williams/Scott/Hamilton all sit it out - and Jarrod just hasn't progressed to the point where he can make a big contribution. Dwyer falls ill and is lost for the season. All of these kids could have helped out this weekend in one way or another.

We saw a cameo from Jones, until it was clear he could not get open, and another one from McDonald that was also brief.

I think we know what is going on with JD, thankfully Silpe is making that academic. As to Goodman, and we've seen a bit of what he is capable of, that is a mystery.

With another tough road trip coming up, I'm looking for a sign that Steve is going to fins some more bench minutes somewhere.

 
SomeGuy 
Postdoc
Posts: 4605

Reg: 11-22-04
02-11-18 04:34 PM - Post#247467    
    In response to Streamers

I guess I don’t understand the cryptic statement about JD.

To a degree with Wood, I think a shooter has to shoot. No matter how smart you are as a coach, you’re probably not going to be able to guess who will be hot and who won’t be.

Out of conference, we had a couple of games where it looked like Wood, Jones, and Donahue weren’t all on the scouting report. So whoever played a lot the last game was marked as a 3 point shooter, but somebody else could come in and be left open on the perimeter. That won’t happen in conference.

I’m really not concerned with the depth. I think we’re playing the right top 6, and I think the depth will show up if we really need it. I wouldn’t change a thing after one loss (though, as I pointed out before, I think i’d try some different defensive matchups than what I saw in the first half. Harvard isn’t a particularly strong offensive team, and we are a good defensive one, so I just don’t buy that there are spots where we don’t match up when guarding them.

 
palestra38 
Professor
Posts: 18840

Reg: 11-21-04
02-12-18 09:54 AM - Post#247514    
    In response to SomeGuy

I really think this was a convergence of factors---5 games in 8 days, the ridiculous Hanover night game, Harvard day game scheduling and Max's medical issue. But we got open 3s all game. When we finally hit a few, we actually made it a game late until Harvard hit a few of their own.

In the rematch, if Rothschild is healthy, Harvard doesn't dominate the middle as much, and our legs should be stronger for the open 3s and gimmee bunnies we missed. Harvard played very well and despite that, it took an extreme off-game for us to lose by 9 on the road.

Of course, my opinion may change if we play next weekend like we did this weekend.

 
Silver Maple 
Postdoc
Posts: 3236

Loc: Westfield, New Jersey
Reg: 11-23-04
02-12-18 10:46 AM - Post#247516    
    In response to palestra38

There's a bit of a spit-and-glue quality to this team-- kind of a jerry-rigged thing (are we still allowed to say 'jerry-rigged?' If not, I apologize and will immediately check myself into some sort of program.) Donahue doesn't have a huge amount of talent, with only two players who I think any other coach in the league would love to have. The rest are a bunch of role players. The fact that Penn is 7-1 at this point is a HUGE testament to the coach's resourcefulness. I can't tell you how impressed I am with the way Donahue is going to war with the army he has. But the downside to that is when you hit a bit of adversity (at least one player significantly under the weather this past weekend), things can deteriorate quickly. That said, I remain optimistic, both for the remainder of this season as well as the longer term. My big hope is that the staff can leverage this season's success into a couple of big recruiting wins.

 
palestra38 
Professor
Posts: 18840

Reg: 11-21-04
02-12-18 10:55 AM - Post#247517    
    In response to Silver Maple

Again, we should have a major infusion of talent with this year's freshman class effectively starting next year--I don't think anyone expected that before this season.

Still, this was a very winnable game despite our inability to stop Harvard inside if we hit a reasonable proportion of 3s by the guys who usually hit those shots and if we didn't miss so many easy layups. We got our shots ---which is why Foreman in the second half just looked at the defense and took it to the basket and why when Betley finally started hitting, we got to within 5 or 6. Sucks to lose, but I'm not all that down about this one. In the past, when Harvard played that well on offense, we lost by 30.

 
mrjames 
Professor
Posts: 5237

Loc: Montclair, NJ
Reg: 11-21-04
02-12-18 11:43 AM - Post#247521    
    In response to palestra38

I wouldn't pin all of your hopes to the 2017 class. From what I heard, Jelani was the best player in Penn's class, so I would expect, even with the ACL, he would be a talent to be excited about. Generally, that's an injury one can fully recover from with confidence (as opposed to a foot, which we've seen multiple times become a chronic problem). The other pieces were seen more as projects and might struggle to contribute consistently until later in their careers.

 
whitakk 
Junior
Posts: 214

Age: 27
Reg: 11-11-14
Re: Let's talk about how deep this team really is
02-12-18 12:17 PM - Post#247531    
    In response to Streamers

Princeton mostly played seven guys last year. Yale's rotation was 7 or maybe 8 down the stretch in 2016. Harvard went seven deep for much of 2015 and was always really thin in the backcourt.

A deep bench is nice to have but it's not crucial. The best starting five or so usually wins.

 
10Q 
Professor
Posts: 14657

Loc: Suburban Philly
Reg: 11-21-04
Let's talk about how deep this team really is
02-12-18 12:32 PM - Post#247534    
    In response to whitakk

Fran often won the Ivy Open with his 7 Iron.

 
PennFan10 
PhD Student
Posts: 1789

Reg: 02-15-15
02-12-18 12:47 PM - Post#247538    
    In response to mrjames

By "the other pieces" I assume you mean Eddie and Jarrod? Jackson is obviously a project. Eddie helped us win a couple games before his injury. While Jarrod has been slow to catch on to the pace of the college game, I would be surprised if he didn't produce significant minutes next year. This team also returns Tyler Hamilton and loses only Darnell while adding Mike Wang. I expect next year's Penn team to be much more talented than this year's version.

 
palestra38 
Professor
Posts: 18840

Reg: 11-21-04
02-12-18 12:52 PM - Post#247539    
    In response to PennFan10

We also lose Wood, who has been a major cog this year. We will have to replace that outside shooting.

 
mrjames 
Professor
Posts: 5237

Loc: Montclair, NJ
Reg: 11-21-04
02-12-18 12:58 PM - Post#247541    
    In response to PennFan10

We'll see. I didn't hear much all that great about Scott or Simmons as prospects. I do think Jelani, if fully recovered, could be a big add for the Quakers.

 
10Q 
Professor
Posts: 14657

Loc: Suburban Philly
Reg: 11-21-04
02-12-18 01:11 PM - Post#247542    
    In response to palestra38

Yep. We'll need another Wood to go with the 7 Iron.

 
PennFan10 
PhD Student
Posts: 1789

Reg: 02-15-15
02-12-18 01:24 PM - Post#247543    
    In response to mrjames

Probably didn't hear much about many of the current Penn recruits, who lead the Ivy League. I am also sure you attribute that to other teams lack of success (injuries) than Penn's success.

We will see.

 
mrjames 
Professor
Posts: 5237

Loc: Montclair, NJ
Reg: 11-21-04
Let's talk about how deep this team really is
02-12-18 01:39 PM - Post#247545    
    In response to PennFan10

Definitely heard a ton about AJ. Don’t think anyone else particularly sticks out. To be fair, Penn is winning with defense, and team defense at that. Typically the stuff I hear involves offensive skills or individual defense (on-ball perimeter or at the rim).

And I do think that the prospect of a 150ish team leading the league is about other teams’ injuries. That being said, it’s harder than people think to be No. 150 and teams that are No. 150 are a LOT better than people think...

 
SomeGuy 
Postdoc
Posts: 4605

Reg: 11-22-04
Re: Let's talk about how deep this team really is
02-12-18 02:26 PM - Post#247548    
    In response to mrjames

The other thing about 150 is that the number is getting better every year. My expectation is that a team on an upward trajectory and led by sophomores is going to have a better ranking next year (and the year after).

No shame in winning the league in a year with no teams in the top 150. Might be shame in losing it, though.

 
SomeGuy 
Postdoc
Posts: 4605

Reg: 11-22-04
02-12-18 02:32 PM - Post#247549    
    In response to mrjames

Yes, and you heard a lot about Djuricic, who has averaged the same number of minutes per game as Scott, and put up a lower ORAT and WS/40 than Simmons (while admittedly playing twice as much).

 
Quakers03 
Professor
Posts: 7791

Reg: 12-07-04
Re: Let's talk about how deep this team really is
02-12-18 02:37 PM - Post#247551    
    In response to mrjames

So where does that leave Betley?

 
mrjames 
Professor
Posts: 5237

Loc: Montclair, NJ
Reg: 11-21-04
02-12-18 03:31 PM - Post#247556    
    In response to SomeGuy

Djuricic has a 112 ORAT on 20% usage in about 30% of team minutes per game. He's been in double figures five times, all of which came at a 100 ORAT or better. He'd also be second in the league in block rate if he plays 8pp more mins to qualify. His post defense is a BIG weakness, but otherwise, he's had some nice games earlier in the year and is a big part of why Harvard has been successful recently. He's a strong rotation player, which is a great add as a freshman out of a class that didn't project to have any immediate stars (I really liked Cambridge, but come on... 113 ORAT on 26% usage, an 8.5% TO rate and a 4% Blk Rate... that's absurd).

We don't really know much about Jarrod. He's only hit 10 mins in three games of which the highest ranked team was No. 335 Howard. His line is basically noise at this point.

Eddie Scott had one game (Monmouth) that everyone went nuts over. Take that away, and there's nothing really there.

 
PennFan10 
PhD Student
Posts: 1789

Reg: 02-15-15
02-12-18 03:38 PM - Post#247557    
    In response to mrjames

There is nothing there because he was injured. Doesn't mean he isn't a lot better than Djuricic or a lot worse.

Conveniently silent on Betley.....I agree Jarrod's contribution is noise.

No one predicted a 7-1 Penn team with virtually zero contribution from the freshmen class. And I remember you actually saying we would be worse on defense this year than we were a year ago. Heck you probably still think that right?



 
Silver Maple 
Postdoc
Posts: 3236

Loc: Westfield, New Jersey
Reg: 11-23-04
02-12-18 03:53 PM - Post#247558    
    In response to PennFan10

I'm sorry, but comparing Eddie Scott to Djuricic is just silly. Scott has played so little this season that he'll probably get another year of eligibility if he wants it. In the end, I guess he might turn out to be better than Djuricic, but there's really no point in trying to compare the two of them right now.

 
 Page 1 of 2 ALL12
Icon Legend Permissions Topic Options
Report Post

Quote Post

Quick Reply

Print Topic

Email Topic

1178 Views





Copyright © 2004-2012 Basketball U. Terms of Use for our Site and Privacy Policy are applicable to you. All rights reserved.
Basketball U. and its subsidiaries are not affiliated in any way with any NCAA athletic conference or member institution.
FusionBB™ Version 2.1 | ©2003-2007 InteractivePHP, Inc.
Execution time: 0.127 seconds.   Total Queries: 16   Zlib Compression is on.
All times are (GMT -0500) Eastern. Current time is 02:21 AM
Top