Untitled Document
Brown Columbia Cornell Dartmouth Harvard Penn Princeton Yale



 Page 11 of 11 « First<891011
Username Post: MBB at Princeton        (Topic#22418)
SomeGuy 
Professor
Posts: 6391

Reg: 11-22-04
Re: MBB at Princeton
01-06-19 08:24 AM - Post#271502    
    In response to Quakers03

Princeton did score on a backdoor cut on the second possession of the game. Derosiers made the cut and scored on a pass from Aririgozuh.

 
SomeGuy 
Professor
Posts: 6391

Reg: 11-22-04
01-06-19 08:28 AM - Post#271503    
    In response to GoBigGreenBasketball

It may well be important. My point is just that last night the minute distribution among players was about the same for both teams. They both basically played 7 guys for 45 minutes.

 
Streamers 
Professor
Posts: 8141
Streamers
Loc: NW Philadelphia
Reg: 11-21-04
01-06-19 10:59 AM - Post#271510    
    In response to SomeGuy

As was pointed out somewhere above, Penn had twice as many TO’s as assists. This is highly unusual for this team, especially with Max in the game. To me, this was the key and we need to give Mitch and his staff credit for a defensive scheme that produced this result. Steve needs to find a counter that will produce 75+ points on Saturday. Penn cannot expect Cannady to lose his shooting eye again.

 
JadwinGeorge 
Senior
Posts: 357

Age: 75
Reg: 12-04-15
01-06-19 12:21 PM - Post#271516    
    In response to Streamers

Not sure Cannady "lost his shooting eye." Donohue defensed him very well. His last few shots were born of frustration in my estimation. He even missed a free throw! But this team is developing other options.

 
TigerFan 
PhD Student
Posts: 1871

Reg: 11-21-04
01-06-19 12:32 PM - Post#271519    
    In response to JadwinGeorge

Tough defense from both teams last night was largely responsible for the low shooting percentages. Many of DC and JL’s misses were closely contended and some were just plain poor shot selection, but both of those guys also missed a number of open shots that I would have expected to drop. (And DC went oh-for-two on FTs!—unheard of!) I expect another tough game next Saturday.

 
Tiger69 
Postdoc
Posts: 2801

Reg: 11-23-04
01-06-19 01:11 PM - Post#271523    
    In response to TigerFan

I think that both teams will make several adjustments as a result of last night. I’m guessing on a different type of game. If it follows the same pattern, I think that it would favor Penn. Ironic, since we seem to have exchanged roles over time.

 
jeromelh 
Junior
Posts: 202

Age: 81
Reg: 03-30-17
01-06-19 02:12 PM - Post#271535    
    In response to GoBigGreenBasketball

My take (fwiw) is that I saw two teams trying to give the game to the other. Penn is very physical and that is why I think a slight majority of the questionable calls went against them. Their physicality definitely affected Lewellyn and Cannady and those two will have to adjust (and I think they will). I was surprised at how few assists Brodeur had. He will need to improve on that and Wang will need to get into the game.
Bottom line-these are two very evenly matched teams and I expect another close game next week.
I am disappointed that Penn and Princeton are playing their two games early in the year

 
weinhauers_ghost 
Postdoc
Posts: 2125

Age: 64
Loc: New York City
Reg: 12-14-09
01-06-19 02:30 PM - Post#271536    
    In response to Streamers

  • Streamers Said:
As was pointed out somewhere above, Penn had twice as many TO’s as assists. This is highly unusual for this team, especially with Max in the game. To me, this was the key and we need to give Mitch and his staff credit for a defensive scheme that produced this result. Steve needs to find a counter that will produce 75+ points on Saturday. Penn cannot expect Cannady to lose his shooting eye again.



At times, especially early in the first half, both Wang and Rothschild looked like guys who hadn't had any game action in a couple of weeks. There was definitely some rust there. Wang not playing in the second half and OT hurt us, I think.

I am also disappointed that we will play these games on consecutive weekends.


 
OldBig5 
Masters Student
Posts: 639

Age: 66
Reg: 02-18-18
01-06-19 03:43 PM - Post#271540    
    In response to weinhauers_ghost

Typical Penn-Princeton game. Just win next Saturday and all will be well. I think Princeton is much better than expected.

 
Tiger69 
Postdoc
Posts: 2801

Reg: 11-23-04
01-06-19 04:44 PM - Post#271548    
    In response to OldBig5

We will definitely have to come up with something additional when Wang is healthy. I want to see these teams square off when everyone is healthy — the Tourney appears to be the first possibility.

 
SomeGuy 
Professor
Posts: 6391

Reg: 11-22-04
01-06-19 05:56 PM - Post#271553    
    In response to jeromelh

I think a good defensive game sometimes looks that way. To me, it looked like a game where both coaches had thought more about how to stop the other team than they had about how to score. I suspect that might reverse this week.



 
SomeGuy 
Professor
Posts: 6391

Reg: 11-22-04
01-06-19 06:06 PM - Post#271555    
    In response to Streamers

Yes — curious if Princeton was doing something specific that was causing Goodman and Woods to drive (even Silpe drove a little more than usual), or if that was by Penn design.

 
Streamers 
Professor
Posts: 8141
Streamers
Loc: NW Philadelphia
Reg: 11-21-04
01-06-19 06:48 PM - Post#271558    
    In response to SomeGuy

Princeton refused to double AJ in the paint, so his pass out opportunities were not there - this also kept in defense in the passing lanes. It also created more space for the Penn guards to drive. They gambled that RA could hinder AJ without help. It worked just enough. Devon was getting open outside, but his 3’s were not dropping. AJ drained a 3 early; I wish he has taken a few more for force the defense out on him.

 
SRP 
Postdoc
Posts: 4894

Reg: 02-04-06
01-06-19 06:50 PM - Post#271559    
    In response to SomeGuy

Since Princeton has been giving up dribble drives for the last two seasons and yesterday they weren't even trying to give help, instead sticking to the outside shooters, Penn going to the rim seemed like an obvious choice. Woods was getting in there and scoring at will for a while. Zero possessions with zone defense by Princeton, which surprised me--Henderson seemed OK with letting the Quakers go one on one on drives.

(BTW, in terms of physical play, Woods cleared out with his off arm like crazy. The refs were consistent about not calling that move on either team. It's interesting that Brodeur is relatively clean in that respect given how much post play he's involved in--he didn't do much hooking or pushing off when he had the ball that I could see.)

 
GoBigGreenBasketball 
Masters Student
Posts: 805

Age: 51
Reg: 05-19-16
01-06-19 07:22 PM - Post#271563    
    In response to jeromelh

I hadn’t thought of that until you mentioned it. It would be nice to have the Ivy games spread out a bit more. We always have Harvard back to back at the begging of ivy play. It would be nice to play them later in the season or at least mix it up a bit year to year.
"...no excuses - only results!”


 
section110 
Masters Student
Posts: 847

Loc: south jersey
Reg: 11-22-04
01-06-19 11:49 PM - Post#271587    
    In response to SRP

Good point. As a Penn fan I notice the Princeton arm extension/push offs not called; so, I'm sure you are right @ Woods.

 
 Page 11 of 11 « First<891011
Icon Legend Permissions Topic Options
Report Post

Quote Post

Quick Reply

Print Topic

Email Topic

3011 Views





Copyright © 2004-2012 Basketball U. Terms of Use for our Site and Privacy Policy are applicable to you. All rights reserved.
Basketball U. and its subsidiaries are not affiliated in any way with any NCAA athletic conference or member institution.
FusionBB™ Version 2.1 | ©2003-2007 InteractivePHP, Inc.
Execution time: 0.218 seconds.   Total Queries: 16   Zlib Compression is on.
All times are (GMT -0500) Eastern. Current time is 01:53 PM
Top