gokinsmen
Postdoc
Posts: 3669
Reg: 02-06-10
|
Yale
02-02-24 11:45 PM - Post#362634
In response to Vonsid
I appreciate your positivey and agree with it. I do think we have regressed a bit though and need to go back to some tape on the offensive side.
Cornell loss was regression (blowout loss where we looked sloppy on both ends).
Tonight was a return to form - lots of great plays in a close loss. Losing on the road to good/solid teams in conference happens to everyone.
Not to give fodder to anti-ILT folks, but now that we have a conference tourney, these losses just don't sting as badly (nor do wins feel as good). Important thing is to learn from them like we did last year.
|
SRP
Postdoc
Posts: 4911
Reg: 02-04-06
|
02-03-24 07:29 AM - Post#362641
In response to gokinsmen
Yale’s overall size really affected the inside game, which in turn let them push out to defend the three more in the second half . They’re good.
I thought Princeton’s defense was mostly good, especially right out of the gate. Yale made a lot of difficult shots; I don’t know whether to be encouraged or worried that their offense felt to me like it underperformed their talent; they just seemed a bit disjointed on many possessions, even ones where they ended up scoring.
I think the Tigers have a good chance in any rematches.
|
Tiger69
Postdoc
Posts: 2816
Reg: 11-23-04
|
Re: Yale
02-03-24 10:40 AM - Post#362651
In response to gokinsmen
Wish I shared your confidence.
GO TIGERS!
|
1LotteryPick1969
Postdoc
Posts: 2275
Age: 73
Loc: Sandy, Utah
Reg: 11-21-04
|
02-03-24 11:19 AM - Post#362654
In response to SRP
Yale’s overall size really affected the inside game, which in turn let them push out to defend the three more in the second half . They’re good.
Woff's legs looked very heavy at the end; we just have no inside game to take advantage of this. So when the three's don't drop.....
|
